Rotational Dynamics of a solid sphere

AI Thread Summary
A solid sphere rolls down a track from a height of 12.0 m and rolls off the edge at a height of 2.0 m. The discussion centers on calculating the horizontal distance the sphere lands from the starting point. Key equations include the conservation of energy and kinematic equations, with emphasis on the sphere's translational and rotational kinetic energy due to rolling without slipping. The initial calculations mistakenly omitted the translational kinetic energy, leading to incorrect results. Clarification on the relationship between translational and rotational speeds helped resolve the confusion.
FaiKT
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A solid sphere starts from rest at the upper end of the track, as shown in figure below, and rolls without slipping until it rolls off the right-hand end. If H = 12.0 m and h = 2.0 m and the track is horizontal at the right-hand end, how far horizontally from point A does the sphere land on the floor?


Homework Equations



mgH = 1/2 I w^2 + mgh
y = vot + 1/2gt^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm not exactly sure how i went wrong here.
the moment of inertia for a solid sphere is 2/5 mr^2 and w^2 = v^2/r^2 so the radius cancels out...after cancelling out the mass as well i come out with
gH = 1/5 v^2 + gh which becomes sqrt(5(gH-gh)) = 22.136 m/s
Since it starts at rest... you use the equation 2 = -4.9t^2 to get a time of 0.639s

Since its asking for horizontal distance i multiplied the velocity by time to get 14.145m, but that's wrong somehow...is there something I'm missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't forget translational kinetic energy.
 
i thought there is no translational kinetic energy since the sphere isn't slipping
 
FaiKT said:
i thought there is no translational kinetic energy since the sphere isn't slipping
No, the sphere's center of mass is definitely moving as it rolls without slipping, so it has both translational and rotational kinetic energy. If it was just spinning in place without moving, then it would only have rotational KE. But here it's rolling along just fine. (Hint: Since it's rolling without slipping, the translational and rotational speeds are related.)
 
ah right..i just got mixed up on a concept, that makes perfect sense now, thanks a lot
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top