Rotational Kinetic Energy of an airplane propeller

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the rotational kinetic energy of an airplane propeller modeled as a slender rod. The propeller has a length of 2.02 m and a mass of 127 kg, rotating at 2300 rpm, resulting in a calculated kinetic energy of approximately 3,731,117.76 J. When considering a reduction in mass to 95.25 kg while maintaining the same kinetic energy, the necessary angular speed is derived using the kinetic energy formula. The moment of inertia for the propeller is also discussed, with corrections made to the initial calculations. The final method for determining the new angular speed is confirmed as valid, ensuring accurate results.
cantgetno
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


An airplane propeller is 2.02 m in length (from tip to tip) with mass 127 kg and is rotating at 2300 rpm about an axis through its center. You can model the propeller as a slender rod.
a)What is its rotational kinetic energy?
b)Suppose that, due to weight constraints, you had to reduce the propeller's mass to 75.0\% of its original mass, but you still needed to keep the same size and kinetic energy. What would its angular speed have to be, in rpm?

Homework Equations


K=0.5 (mr^2) w^2
(m***, radius, w angular speed)

The Attempt at a Solution


a)
2300 RPM = 38.33 RPS = 76.66 radians/s
2300RPM=240 rad/s

KE=0.5 (127) (1.01)^2 (240)^2 = 3731117.76 J

b)
new mass = 95.25kg

KE = 0.5(95.25)(1.01)^2 (w)^2

2 KE /(95.25)(1.01)^2) = (w)^2

[2 KE /(95.25)(1.01)^2)]^0.5 = wbut I am sure my original KE is wrong so..

thanks for the help
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
2300RPM=240 rad/s

KE=0.5 (1/12)M L^2 (w)^2 ?
giving

1/24 x 127 x 2.02^2 x 240^2 = 1243705.9
?
 
I get 241 for ω.

I didn't calculate the rest out, but that looks like the right method now.
 
bingo
thanks lots and lots
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top