Graduate Russian Commentary on Chain Wheel Experiment

  • Thread starter Thread starter wrobel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Chain Wheel
Click For Summary
The discussion highlights an experiment involving pull rolls for a paper napkin folder, where the goal was to avoid pinching the paper to preserve the emboss pattern. The initial proof of concept used larger rolls with tread tape, which functioned effectively. However, when the machine operated at high speeds of 1000 FPM, the smaller knurled steel rolls stopped pulling due to centrifugal force equaling the back tension. To resolve this, the gap between the pull rolls was adjusted to ensure proper nipping of the paper. Ultimately, while the design required an operator adjustment, the machine was able to function as intended.
wrobel
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
1,226
Reaction score
1,034
Just a nice experiment; comment in Russian is obvious
 
Physics news on Phys.org
At highway speeds, steel belted radials are often heavy enough to stay round even after a blow out.
 
I once got tripped up by exactly that effect. The project was pull rolls for a paper napkin folder. We did not want to pinch the paper between a pair of rolls because that could squash the emboss pattern, so we tried a pair of S-wrapped rolls similar to the diagram below.
Pull Rolls.jpg

The input roll of the folder grabbed the paper using vacuum, so could only pull with about 0.3 lbs force. The necessary tension at that point was about 3 lbs in order to keep the web taut after the embosser, and pull it over the folding plows. The tension increase is provided by pull rolls. The proof of concept test used a pair of scrounged rolls about 12" diameter covered with tread tape. It worked perfectly. The actual rolls were about 4" diameter knurled steel. The measured coefficient of friction was 1.7 to 2.0 with the tread tape, and about 0.4 with the knurled steel.

When the machine got up to speed, about 1000 FPM, the pull rolls stopped pulling. It turned out that the centrifugal force was equal to the back tension at that speed with the smaller rolls. The design was locked in by that point, so we adjusted the gap between the pull rolls to nip the paper just enough to make it work. We had hoped to eliminate an operator adjustment, but at least the machine worked.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K