Rutherford cross-section from QED

Einj
Messages
464
Reaction score
59
Hi everyone. I have a question about the calculation of Rutherford cross section in the context of QED. I know how to compute it using the usual four potential:
$$
A_\mu(q)=(\frac{e}{q^2},0,0,0)
$$
and taking the matrix element to be:
$$
\mathcal{M}=\bar u_{s'}(p')\gamma_\mu u_s(p)A^{\mu}(q).
$$

I was wondering if it is possible to compute it also by considering it as the process e+γ→e, i.e. taking the matrix element to be:
$$
\mathcal{M}=e\bar u_{s'}(p')\gamma_\mu u_s(p)\epsilon^\mu,
$$
where \epsilon^\mu is the photon polarization.

In this case I got (if I did everything correctly):
$$
\frac{1}{2}\sum_{spin}|\mathcal{M}|^2=2e^2q^2.
$$

My question is: how should I now integrate this to obtain the cross section? In order words, what is the phase space for this weird 2→1 process?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Einj said:
I was wondering if it is possible to compute it also by considering it as the process e+γ→e, i.e. taking the matrix element to be:
$$
\mathcal{M}=e\bar u_{s'}(p')\gamma_\mu u_s(p)\epsilon^\mu,
$$
where \epsilon^\mu is the photon polarization.
No, but you can compute it from Møller scattering, that is, e + e → e + e, with exchange of a photon, in which M is something like

$$
\mathcal{M}=e^2 \frac{\bar u(p_1')\gamma^\mu u(p_1) \bar u(p_2')\gamma_\mu u(p_2)}{(p_1' - p_1)^2}
$$

and then take the nonrelativistic limit.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Does it mean just to take the mass of one of the two electrons to be infinite?
 
Einj said:
Does it mean just to take the mass of one of the two electrons to be infinite?
I don't think you need to, I think you can just go to the CM system and regard it as one of the electrons scattering off its mirror image.
 
Sounds good, thanks!
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...
Back
Top