Scanning Tunnelling Microscope

ZedCar
Messages
353
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



The tip of a scanning tunnelling microscope is placed 1.0 nm away from a conducting surface and a potential of dV = 0.03 V is applied to the surface relative to the tip. When the tip is moved laterally to a new position on the surface the tunnelling current increases by 50%. What is the change in the tip to surface distance (in nm)? The work function of the tip and the surface are both 4.0 eV.
(a) –0.15 (b) 0.0 (c) +0.15 (d) –0.02 (e) +0.02


Homework Equations



Tunnelling probability P

P ~ exp(-2αx)

and

α = { (2me(ϕ-dV))^0.5 } / (h-bar)

I calculate α to be 1.025 x 10^10 which is correct.

Then I use :

|Below is x sub 2, and x sub 1|

P2 / P1 = exp(-2αx2) / exp(-2αx1)

1.5 below is due to 50% in question.

1.5 = exp(2αdx)
log(1.5) = 2αdx
dx = 2.0 x 10^-11
dx = 0.02nm

So answer (e).

However, the solution is given as answer (d).

So either there is a problem in the signs I have attributed to the powers in the exp terms when calculating P2/P1. Or the given solution is incorrect and I have the correct answer.

Was wondering if anyone could clarify?

Thank you.


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
ZedCar said:
P ~ exp(-2αx)

P2 / P1 = exp(-2αx2) / exp(-2αx1)

1.5 = exp(2αdx)

dx = 0.02nm

Note that you've defined dx to be equal to x1 - x2 according to the expressions above. But the "change in x" would normally be defined as (xfinal-xinitial) = x2 - x1

An increase in tunneling probability corresponds to a decrease in tip-to-surface distance x.
 
TSny said:
Note that you've defined dx to be equal to x1 - x2 according to the expressions above. But the "change in x" would normally be defined as (xfinal-xinitial) = x2 - x1

An increase in tunneling probability corresponds to a decrease in tip-to-surface distance x.

Thanks very much TSny!

I see where I was going wrong now!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top