Scattering of neotrinos off an iron block

Gal Winer
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a beam of neutrinos moving in the x direction at energy of 200 GeV, and passing through a block of iron.

(a) The density of iron is ρ = 7.9gcm−3. In the rest frame of the neutrino, what is the flux of iron nuclei which are moving in its direction (give the answer in term of the neutrino velocity, the iron density, and the iron nucleus mass)?

(b) The neutrino might scatter off a nucleus with cross section σν. What is the probability for a neutrino to scatter in an infinitesi- mal length element dx? If N(x) is the number of surviving neu- trinos, How many neutrino scatterings in total will occur in an infinitesimal length element dx?

2. The attempt at a solution

(a) i wrote to flux to be: \phi=-\frac{V_{\mu}\rho}{M_{Fe}}\hat{x}
where the quantities have obvious meanings

(b) the cross section \sigma_{\mu} is in units of: \frac{\frac{scattering}{second}}{flux}
so i try to multiply \phi\sigma_{\mu} and get \frac{scattering}{second}. I'm not sure how to move from here to get a probability.


thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top