Second Law of Thermodynamics problem

aliaze1
Messages
173
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



As shown in the figure, a system undergoing a power cycle develops a net power output of 1MW while receiving energy by heat transfer from steam condensing from saturated vapor to saturated liquid at a pressure of 100 kPa. Energy is discharged from the cycle by heat transfer to a nearby lake at 17 deg. C. These are the only significant heat transfers. Kinetic and potential energy effects can be ignored. For operation at steady state, determine the minimum theoretical mass flow rate, in kg/s, required by any such cycle.

l_fa9580eece1942bfb437f74ec4e78486.jpg

Homework Equations



(the book has letters with dots above them, these are represented by 'd')

dW = dQH-dQC
l_3c57a33c37ca42b6acadd05371bce2b4.jpg
(equals zero)

The Attempt at a Solution


So I just did this problem again, and here is what I get:

I calculate efficiency, which is 1-(Tc/Th), T being in Kelvin. I get 41/186, or ~0.2204

Then I use the formila Q=W/n, n is efficiency, so it is 1000000/(41/186) = ~4536585.4

Then plugging this Q into the mass flow formula, where gz and V^2/2 are zero:

4530585.4-1000000+m(2675-417), 2675 and 417 being enthalpy values at the states given

I get a negative number, but mass flow rate can't really be negative per say, so I end up with m=1566.2468

Am I right?Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I updated the problem with my current solution (or what I think is the solution)

Please let me know if I am on track

Thanks!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top