Seeking Textbook Recommendations for My Advanced Nuclear Physics Class

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding a suitable undergraduate Nuclear Physics textbook to replace an out-of-print text written by the professor. Krane's book is considered but has received mixed reviews, particularly after the user's experience with Krane's Modern Physics. Another recommended text is "Modern Physics" by Taylor, Zafiratos, and Dubson, praised for its clarity and ease of understanding, though it simplifies some concepts, notably the Hamiltonian operator in the Schrödinger equation, which may hinder deeper comprehension. The text includes dedicated chapters on nuclear physics but is noted to be more expensive than Krane's book.
acme37
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
My Nuclear Physics class this semester is using the textbook my professor wrote. It is out of print, and with good reason. Can anyone recommend a suitable undergraduate Nuclear Physics textbook which covers most of the basics at a reasonably advanced level? Looking at the usenet booklist Krane looks good, but I used Krane's Modern Physics last semester and had mixed impressions.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
acme37 said:
My Nuclear Physics class this semester is using the textbook my professor wrote. It is out of print, and with good reason. Can anyone recommend a suitable undergraduate Nuclear Physics textbook which covers most of the basics at a reasonably advanced level? Looking at the usenet booklist Krane looks good, but I used Krane's Modern Physics last semester and had mixed impressions.


We use Modern Physics: Taylor, Zafiratos, Dubson.

I really like this book overall. Most of the material is written in a way that's very clear and easy to understand. My only real complaint was how they handled the Hamiltonian operator in the Schroedinger equation (though that's not an issue with the nuclear physics portion). They tried to keep the Schroedinger equation as simple as possible, but in so doing made it appear more ad hoc and difficult to understand (our professor more than made up for this in class, so it wasn't too bad a problem, but I still think the text was lacking in that regard). Actually, the text does this a fair amount, it keeps a lot of things more simple that it needs to, however the Schroedinger equation was the only time that I felt that it seriously detracted from the level of understanding and insight. Chapters 16,17,18 deal specifically with nuclear physics.

A caveat: Taylor's book is about double the price of Krane's I see on amazon.
 
For the following four books, has anyone used them in a course or for self study? Compiler Construction Principles and Practice 1st Edition by Kenneth C Louden Programming Languages Principles and Practices 3rd Edition by Kenneth C Louden, and Kenneth A Lambert Programming Languages 2nd Edition by Allen B Tucker, Robert E Noonan Concepts of Programming Languages 9th Edition by Robert W Sebesta If yes to either, can you share your opinions about your personal experience using them. I...
Hi, I have notice that Ashcroft, Mermin and Wei worked at a revised edition of the original solid state physics book (here). The book, however, seems to be never available. I have also read that the reason is related to some disputes related to copyright. Do you have any further information about it? Did you have the opportunity to get your hands on this revised edition? I am really curious about it, also considering that I am planning to buy the book in the near future... Thanks!
I’ve heard that in some countries (for example, Argentina), the curriculum is structured differently from the typical American program. In the U.S., students usually take a general physics course first, then move on to a textbook like Griffiths, and only encounter Jackson at the graduate level. In contrast, in those countries students go through a general physics course (such as Resnick-Halliday) and then proceed directly to Jackson. If the slower, more gradual approach is considered...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
19
Views
8K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top