Usiia
- 29
- 4
It is a cubic relation.PeroK said:Just to say that I'm getting an "unsolvable" cubic equation in ##\tan \theta##. Does the question expect an exact solution?
The forum discussion revolves around verifying the correctness of an electromagnetic theory solution involving forces and angles. Key equations include the gravitational force equation \(F=mg\tan \theta\) and the electrostatic force equation \(F_c = \frac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0} \frac{2q^2}{r^2}\). The participants identify errors in the rearrangement of equations and discuss the implications of limits on mass and gravitational force. The final correct relation derived is \(\tan^3 \theta (1 + \tan^2 \theta) = \frac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2}\).
PREREQUISITESPhysics students, educators, and researchers focusing on electromagnetic theory, force analysis, and mathematical modeling in physics.
It is a cubic relation.PeroK said:Just to say that I'm getting an "unsolvable" cubic equation in ##\tan \theta##. Does the question expect an exact solution?
Of course this means nothing to me. I am supposing that this is a related rates problem and that I need more than what I think I have so far in terms of the tangent.Usiia said:Answer provided that I just found at the back of the book $$ \tan^3 \theta ( 1+ \tan^2 \theta ) = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$
First, generate the force balancing equations for ##T, F## and ##mg##.Usiia said:Of course this means nothing to me. I am supposing that this is a related rates problem and that I need more than what I think I have so far in terms of the tangent.
Need to go to work now, but will come back to this with this approach.PeroK said:First, generate the force balancing equations for ##T, F## and ##mg##.
I get $$ \tan \theta (\sin^2 \theta ) = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$which is the same as $$\frac{ \tan^3 \theta}{1+ \tan^2 \theta} = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$Usiia said:Answer provided that I just found at the back of the book $$ \tan^3 \theta ( 1+ \tan^2 \theta ) = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$
You are right, I missed the "/" it is the second.PeroK said:I get $$ \tan \theta (\sin^2 \theta ) = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$which is the same as $$\frac{ \tan^3 \theta}{1+ \tan^2 \theta} = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$
PeroK said:I get $$ \tan \theta (\sin^2 \theta ) = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$which is the same as $$\frac{ \tan^3 \theta}{1+ \tan^2 \theta} = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 mgl^2} $$
This can't be right. ##r = 2l \sin \theta##.Usiia said:$$ r = l \sin \theta $$
You have an extra factor of ##2q^2## there. The next line is correct, but doesn't follow from that:Usiia said:$$ F_c = \dfrac{2q^2}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 } \dfrac{2q^2}{(l \sin \theta)^2} $$
You got the right answer in the end, but there are still some mistakes.Usiia said:$$ F_c = \dfrac{q^2}{8 \pi \epsilon_0 l^2 \sin^2 \theta}$$
Okay, but it's still wrong in some of your equations:Usiia said:I edited it, equations needed pruning and it missed my eye. Number 4 needed to be as you mentioned.
Usiia said:$$ F_c = \dfrac{1}{4 \pi \epsilon_0 } \dfrac{2q^2}{(l \sin \theta)^2} $$