Separate sand, salt, water through whatever means necessary

AI Thread Summary
To separate sand, salt, and water, one effective method involves heating the mixture to dissolve the salt while leaving the sand intact, followed by filtration to remove the sand. Afterward, cooling the solution can help precipitate the salt as its solubility decreases. There is a clarification that pure water freezes at 0 degrees Celsius, but the presence of salt lowers the freezing point, complicating the separation process. Boiling off the water after filtering out the sand is also suggested as a straightforward approach to isolate the salt. This discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding solubility and phase changes in the separation process.
aek
Messages
82
Reaction score
0
Hi,
i have this practical experiment coming up.
i need any help available.
i need to separate sand, salt, water through whatever means necassary.
Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm how about first heat the mixture so salt will dissolve but sand will not then filter the sand out. Then cool the water near 0, which decreases the solubility of salt in water. Then you can filter the salt too.
 
i don't understand how sand will not filter out sand. And when water is near 0, how are you going to filter it out, it's ice!
 
aek said:
i don't understand how sand will not filter out sand.

This makes no sense. The sand will be less soluble in the water than the salt, so if the sand is not dissolved, you will be able to filter it out.

aek said:
And when water is near 0, how are you going to filter it out, it's ice!

No, it's not. Pure water freezes AT 0 degrees Celcius, (at atmospheric pressure) not NEAR. With added salt, the melting point is dropped even further, this is why we grit our roads.

In any case, to separate water from salt, you should probably just boil the water off (obviously once you've removed your sand by filtration).
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top