Series versus Parallel Capacitors

AI Thread Summary
Capacitors in series share the same charge, leading to different voltages across each due to their varying capacitances. In contrast, capacitors in parallel experience the same voltage, but their charges differ based on their individual capacitances. The charge stored in a capacitor is directly proportional to its capacitance and the voltage applied, as described by the formula Q = V*C. Therefore, it is possible for capacitors with different capacitances to hold different amounts of charge when connected in parallel. The discussion highlights the fundamental differences in behavior between series and parallel capacitor configurations.
zoner7
Messages
89
Reaction score
0
This is not so much a homework as just a general question.

I understand the reasoning behind capacitors in a series all of have same charge, which consequently causes each one to have a separate voltage. But why do capacitors in parallel not have the same amount of charge. They all receive the same voltage. Even though capacitance can differ among capacitors in a series, they still all have the same charge. Why would capacitance affect the charge of capacitors in parallel differently?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Remember that voltage is a measure of how 'hard' the current pushes, not the amount. The current in a parallel series is split, so why wouldn't the amount of charge be split too? Basically current is the net flow of electrons in some time. so when the amount of electrons in some time vary for the entire circuit why wouldn't the amount of electrons stored in anyone capacitor be different.

Someone correct me if I'm off on some definition here but I believe the idea is correct. My electricity is a tad rusty but this answer seemed the most obvious to me.
 
is it possible for two capacitors the following two capacitors to exist: one has a capacitance of 4F and a charge of +q, and the other has a capacitance of 2F and a charge of +5q.

I think that is it because capacitance is simply a constant that describes the rate of change of charge per unit voltage. If the +5q capacitor has a voltage of 5v, then the two capacitors would be feasible.

Since factors such as dielectrics, area and distance determine the capacitance, then it it possible for the two capacitors to exist.

Can anyone give me a hand on this one?
 
A capacitor is something that holds charge. If you add a couple in parallel then it's like you have more than one cup lined up to pour charge into.

Q = V*C

or just looking at the capacitor it's C = Q/V.

As you noted if they are in series the charges equalize across the equivalent capacitor, and the lower voltage at each yields lower charges at each. (The equivalent capacitance is less, the reverse of when they are in parallel.)
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top