Seriously? Moment of Force about a specified Axis

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around a user's struggle to calculate the moment of force about a specified axis, ultimately leading to an incorrect answer. The user outlines their method, which involves using Cartesian vectors and cross products to find the resultant moment. Feedback suggests that the user may have miscalculated the second cross product, indicating that the moment should only have an i component. The user expresses frustration over recurring mistakes despite careful efforts. The conversation emphasizes the importance of reviewing calculations and understanding the concepts behind the cross products.
Saladsamurai
Messages
3,009
Reaction score
7
[SOLVED] Seriously? Moment of Force about a specified Axis

So I really thought I understood this. I have attached the problem and attempt at solution. It should be easy to follow. Problem
Picture1-3.png

Attempt at Solution
This was my process:

1. Write each F and each r as cartesian vectors
2. Find each moment by cross product.
3. Add the moments to get resultant moment M_R. Find unit vector along Oa axis=U_oa
4. Use resultant Moment and Unit vector along Oa to find
M_R dot U_oa=|M_oa|
5. Write as Cartesian vector-->|M_oa|*U_oa
Picture2-2.png

The answer is supposed to be 26.1i-15.1j lb*ft. As you can see, my answer isn't close (WTF else is new!)

What is wrong with my method?
Thanks,
Casey
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't believe I keep getting the same wrong answer!
 
I think for Moment 2 you suppose to only have (i) term
 
Look at your second cross product again. Don't get discouraged, :-).

Imagine attaching a flexible pipe from the origin to the a point on the line of action of F2 and pulling on it with a rope in the direction of f2, the pipe would begin to trace out a disk and the direction of the moment caused by F2 about the origin would be defined as being perpendicular to this disk and hence must only have an i component.
 
Last edited:
tongpu said:
I think for Moment 2 you suppose to only have (i) term

dontdisturbmycircles said:
Look at your second cross product again. Don't get discouraged, :-).

Thanks guys! I was worried that my method was wrong. I wonder if I will EVER stop making tiny stupid errors. I just can't seem to stop...no matter how careful and aware I think I am being.

Oh well...siggghhh.
Thanks again!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top