Setting Up Lagrangian, David Morin 6.25

Timeia
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A rigid “T” consists of a long rod glued perpendicular to another rod of length l that is pivoted at the origin. The T rotates around in a horizontal plane with constant frequency ω. A mass m is free to slide along the long rod and is connected to the intersection of the rods by a spring with spring constant k and equilibrium length zero. Find r(t), where r is the position of the mass along the long rod. There is a special value of ω; what is it, and why is it special? Figure 6.27 in David Morin Classical Mechanics

Homework Equations


L = T - V

The Attempt at a Solution



I am having trouble setting up the Lagrangian for this system so that it is in appropriate coordinate system.

So far T = ½mv^2 + ½ω^2 + ½kx^2

V = -kx - mghsin(ωt)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your expression for the Lagrangian is wrong. I think that the kinetic energy term should be:
(1/2)Iω2 + (1/2)mv2 and the potential energy should be
-(1/2)kr2. I is the moment of inertia of the rod and v is the velocity of the mass in the horizontal plane. I suggest writing the velocity in terms of the rotational angle and the x and y components in the plane, i.e.
x = rcos(ϑ), y = rsin(ϑ),
dx/dt = -rdϑ/dt sin(ϑ) +dr/dtcos(ϑ),
dy/dt =rdϑ/dt + dr/dtsin(ϑ),
and v2=((dx/dt)2 + (dy/dt)2)
 
okay thanks! Except l is changing with time as well based on where the mass is on the rod, so l = sqrt(l2 + r2)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top