Shape of field line in an electric dipole

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the intersection point C(m,0) of an electric field line from a dipole formed by charges +q and -q located at A(0,h) and B(0,-h) respectively. The attempt to apply Gauss' law leads to an integral that seems unsolvable for m, indicating a potential error in the setup or calculations. Participants clarify the integration process, emphasizing the need to consider the symmetry of the electric field and the correct form of the integrand. The conversation highlights confusion regarding the constant k and the integration limits, suggesting a deeper examination of the assumptions made in the calculations. Overall, the thread reflects a collaborative effort to resolve the complexities of electric dipole field line analysis.
darkrystal
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a xy-plane, we have a +q charge in A(0,h) and a -q charge in B(0,-h).
Let's take a field line passing through A, that has horizontal slope in A. Find the point C(m,0) where this field line intersects the X axis.

Homework Equations



I think Gauss' law \epsilon_0 \oint \vec{E} \cdot d\vec{A}=q


The Attempt at a Solution



Let's take a surface passing through A and following the field lines till the y=0 plane. Apply the Gauss' law to it: the flux is only through the base of this surface, so that we should get
\displaystyle q=\epsilon_0 \int d\Phi = \epsilon_0 \int_0^m \frac{2khq}{(x^2+h^2)^{\frac32}} \cdot 2 \pi x dx​
where the second integral is the flux calculated for concentric rings around the origin. This equation, though, has no solutions for m, since it reduces to
\displaystyle h(\frac{1}{h}-\frac{1}{\sqrt{h^2+m^2}})=1​
which is clearly impossible...

Thank you all for your time, and please forgive my bad english and my even worse physics :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's early and I think I'm missing something here but I'll get the ball rolling, I'm starting by assuming you got to the integral correctly and had the correct integrand

First, what happened to k? Second, you're integrating over x in that integral, the only dependency on x is just, well, that single x
 
I'll write it in a bit more detail. Let's take the flux across a ring (x to x+dx). The distance of every point of this ring from the two charges is the same, so the electric field must be the same on the whole ring. We get this field by multiplying by 2 the y-component of the field generated by the first charge only (this should be true by symmetry). Putting all together, the field SHOULD be (2) \cdot \frac{kq}{x^2+h^2} \cdot \frac{h}{\sqrt{x^2+h^2}}, where the first 2 is to take in account the doubling I was talking about, the first fraction is the field generated by the first charge, and the second the cosine of the angle (to get only one the y-component). Then I'm multiplying all by the area of the ring, and that's all for the integrand.
For k... that's what puzzles me, mainly. Taking what I can out of the integral, I get a \epsilon_0 4 \pi k, and everything magically vanishes...

For the integral, I got \int \frac{x}{(x^2+h^2)^{\frac32}} = - \frac{1}{\sqrt{h^2+x^2}}, and I think this should be correct (anyways, if anybody is willing to check...)

Just one last thing: in the integrand... there isn't only one x... I couldn't get what you meant, sorry

Thank you very much for your answer, anyway!
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top