Is the Velocity Equation for SHM Correctly Derived Without Calculus?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the derivation of the velocity equation for simple harmonic motion (SHM) without using calculus. The initial equation provided is v = -wx0cos(wt), where v0 is the maximum velocity and ω is the angular frequency. Clarification is sought on how to express velocity when displacement is at its maximum and how the sine function applies at different time instances. It is noted that if t=0 when the particle is at equilibrium, the displacement equation becomes x = A sin(ωt), leading to the velocity equation v = Aw cos(ωt). The conversation emphasizes understanding the relationship between displacement, velocity, and the role of sine and cosine in SHM.
ProPM
Messages
64
Reaction score
0
Hi :smile:

I am a bit lost with the equations for velocity:

I don't know Calculus yet, so my teacher just gave me the equation:

-wx0cos(wt) (w being omega)

He then said: v0 = wx0

and therefore, concluded: -v0cos(wt)

and then for when the displacement is maximum at time = 0: v0cos(wt)

Is this correct? I mean, I am obviously not doubting him but I am a bit confused plus my notes were not very organized on this day...

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
when t =0, ωt = 0 and cos(ωt) = 1

So vo = -xo*ω
 
So the equation would be:

v0cos(wt)

and for sin, how would it work?
 
Last edited:
The sign and the function sin or cos depends on the instant you are taking t=0. If t is taken zero when the particle is at the equilibrium position (x=0) than the equation for displacement will be x= A sin wt and that for velocity will be v = Aw cos wt

thus at extreme position wt = 90 deg, gives x = A and v = 0.
(A is amplitude and Aw = Vo, the maximum velocity)
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top