MHB Show that dim(Ker(SoT))<=dim(KerT)+dim(KerS)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Denis99
  • Start date Start date
Denis99
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Like in the topic, the goal is to show that def(SoT) <= def(T)+def(S) (where def(P)=dim(KerP), T,S:V -> V are linear transformations and V<infinity).
Unfortunately Ker(SoT) isn`t a subset of Ker(S)+Ker(T), so I try to solve this problem starting with that Ker(T) is subset of Ker(SoT), but I don`t know if this is a good idea.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Denis99 said:
Like in the topic, the goal is to show that def(SoT) <= def(T)+def(S) (where def(P)=dim(KerP), T,S:V -> V are linear transformations and V<infinity).
Unfortunately Ker(SoT) isn`t a subset of Ker(S)+Ker(T), so I try to solve this problem starting with that Ker(T) is subset of Ker(SoT), but I don`t know if this is a good idea.
Hi Denis99, and welcome to MHB.

Yes, definitely start with $\ker(T)$. You need to know how much of the range of $S$ lies in $\ker(T)$. So let $\def\ran{\operatorname{ran}}W = \ran(S) \cap\ker(T)$, and let $k = \dim(W)$. (Notice that $k\leqslant \dim(\ker T)$.) Choose a basis $\{w_1,\ldots,w_k\}$ for $W$. For $1\leqslant i\leqslant k$, choose $v_i\in V$ with $Sv_i = w_i$ (this is possible because each $w_i$ is in the range of $S$).

Now let $\{u_1,\ldots,u_r\}$ be a basis for $\ker(S)$, where $r = \dim(\ker S)$. Show that the set $\{u_1,\ldots,u_r,v_1,\ldots,v_k\}$ spans $\ker(S\circ T)$ in order to get your result.
 
Opalg said:
Hi Denis99, and welcome to MHB.

Yes, definitely start with $\ker(T)$. You need to know how much of the range of $S$ lies in $\ker(T)$. So let $\def\ran{\operatorname{ran}}W = \ran(S) \cap\ker(T)$, and let $k = \dim(W)$. (Notice that $k\leqslant \dim(\ker T)$.) Choose a basis $\{w_1,\ldots,w_k\}$ for $W$. For $1\leqslant i\leqslant k$, choose $v_i\in V$ with $Sv_i = w_i$ (this is possible because each $w_i$ is in the range of $S$).

Now let $\{u_1,\ldots,u_r\}$ be a basis for $\ker(S)$, where $r = \dim(\ker S)$. Show that the set $\{u_1,\ldots,u_r,v_1,\ldots,v_k\}$ spans $\ker(S\circ T)$ in order to get your result.

Thank you very much! That solution is brilliant :)
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top