Signs associated with angular momentum

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the angular momentum of a mass M rotating about a shaft, with a focus on its components. The angular momentum vector L is described as having both vertical and horizontal components, with Lz being positive and defined as Lsin(theta), while the horizontal component Lr has a magnitude of Lcos(theta). There is confusion regarding the sign of the radial component, with the authors of a referenced book claiming it is negative, leading to questions about the implications of sign conventions. It is clarified that the designation of positive or negative depends on the chosen coordinate system, and that the actual direction of the component is what matters. Ultimately, understanding the direction and sign conventions is crucial for accurately describing angular momentum.
cardinalboy
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A light but stiff rod of length R is attached at an angle theta to a shaft along the z-axis; the rod is used to rotate (a single) mass M about the shaft. The mass moves with speed v in a CCW direction. Describe the angular momentum, L, of the mass with respect to the attachment point of the rod.

Homework Equations



L = r x p
L = rmv

The Attempt at a Solution



Since L has both horizontal and vertical components, there will be two equations. By the right hand rule, L should be perpendicular to the plane containing the rod (R) and the linear momentum vector (p) and so it points at an angle theta relative to the xy plane in a direction toward the z axis.

The vertical component of L points upward, parallel to the z axis, and so it is positive: Lsin(theta), where L = Rmv.

The horizontal (radial) component is perpendicular to the z axis and pointing inward toward the z axis, so it is positive or negative? I am not sure how to find the sign associated with this horizontal component. I see that it should have a magnitude of Lcos(theta), but I am not sure how to determine the sign.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A vector has a magnitude and a direction, and is completely determined by these two. What exactly do you mean by asking whether it's positive or negative? If a fixed direction is given, then the component of a vector along that direction may be said to be positive or negative, as you have done in the case of the component of L along the z-axis.

For example, if I have the vector 2i+j, it's meaningless to say whether it's positive or negative.
 
Second Attempt At Angular Momentum Post

I'm sorry about my poor description previously. :redface: I tried as best I could to give a diagram of the problem I've described above (see attachment).

The triangle that I have drawn on the mass (and I've given a bigger version of this triangle off to the right) represents the angular momentum vector L, as well as its components Lz, which is vertical component and parallel to the z-axis, and LR, which is pointing radially inward toward the z axis.

I see that, by the triangle I've drawn, the vertical component Lz should be Lsin(theta) and should be positive since upwards is defined as the positive direction. I also recognize that the radial (or horizontal) component of L, or LR, should have a magnitude of Lcos(theta).

The authors of a book I am reading claim that the magnitude of LR is negative. Is this negative simply because the authors have decided that radially inward is the negative direction and radially outward is the positive direction, or is there some deeper meaning here that I am missing. Could I, if I wanted to, define inward as the positive direction and still get the proper solutions to a problem involving angular momentum. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated. Thanks!
 

Attachments

Last edited:
cardinalboy said:
The authors of a book I am reading claim that the magnitude of LR is negative.

Magnitudes are always postitive by definition, so I assume you (or the book) meant that the radial component is negative.
Is this negative simply because the authors have decided that radially inward is the negative direction and radially outward is the positive direction, or is there some deeper meaning here that I am missing. Could I, if I wanted to, define inward as the positive direction and still get the proper solutions to a problem involving angular momentum.
Sure. What really counts is the actual direction, which is inward (assuming the mass moves in a CCW direction when viewed from the +z axis looking down). Whether you call a component negative or positive depends on your sign convention/coordinate system.
 
(The picture took an awful lot of time to be approved!)

All right, so they mean negative in the r direction.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top