Simple EM Problem (not to me for some reason)

  • Thread starter Thread starter FrogPad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Em Reason
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the net magnetic field strength at the center of a square arrangement of four parallel wires carrying the same current. The original poster attempts to use the formula B = (μ₀ I) / (2 π r) for each wire and sums the contributions, mistakenly concluding that the net field is 4I. However, it is clarified that the magnetic fields produced by the wires oppose each other due to their directions, leading to a net magnetic field of zero. The right-hand rule is emphasized to determine the direction of the magnetic fields, which helps visualize the cancellation effect. Ultimately, understanding the vector nature of magnetic fields and their interactions is crucial for solving the problem correctly.
FrogPad
Messages
801
Reaction score
0
I'm unsure what I'm doing wrong here... it has to be something. So let me explain the problem:

I'm supposed to rank the net magnetfic field strength for various arrangements. In all of the arrangements the magnitude of the current is the same. The distance between each of the charges is the same. We are supposed to find the magnetic field in the center of each arrangement. (The center of the square)

The first arrangement looks like this (please excuse the ascii art)

Code:
  [*]------[*]
   |           |
   |           |
   |           |
  [*]------[*]
(EDIT: I've been trying to make this thing look pretty. I give up on it. It is just supposed to be a square)
This is supposed to be a cross sectional area of four wires that are run in parallel. The distance between each wire is the same. [*] means the direction of the current is running into the page.

Ok, so this is how I "thought" I should solve this problem.

We can use B = \frac{\mu_0 I}{2 \pi r} to model the field strength at a distance r from each wire. If we let [*] be a positive direction. Next, we use vector superposition to get the net magnetic field.

Thus:
B_{net}=B_1+B_2+B_3+B_4 = \frac{\mu_0}{2 \pi r} \sum_{n=1}^{4} I_n

We can drop the terms that are not changing because it's not relevant for the ranking. Thus:
B_{net} = I_1+I_2+I_3+I_4

So for the ASCII diagram I have, then:
B_{net} = 4I

However, the example we were given states that B_{net} = 0.

How am I not modeling this correctly. I guess I'm having a hard time visualizing how the circular magnetic fields are interacting with each other.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
HINT: The magnetic field at a point is a vector - use the right hand rule to determine its direction.
 
That was an amazingly fast reply tide.

So would I think about the magnetic field at each point as a piece of the \vec B with length d\vec l. Which I could just extend the length with a factor to think about it as a larger magnetic line.


So then using the right hand rule I would have four vectors.

Where the top two oppose each other, and the bottom two oppose each other. Which cancel to get 0?

So am I just making a mistake on the sign I'm choosing for I
 
You're doing fine! Here's a pointer or two:

If a wire is straight then the magnetic field it produces will be azimuthal. That will be true no matter how long they are. In your case, all you have to do is recognize they each produce the same (magnitude) of magnetic field and all you have to concern yourself with is their direction.

And, there was nothing special about the speed of the reply - I just happened to be here just after you wrote.
 
Cool. Thank you.

By the way. I didn't mean to imply that anything was special about the speed of the reply. It was just surprising. I was trying to fix that stupid ASCII drawing of the diagram, and I kept clicking on save. Then all of a sudden there was a reply here:smile:. I've just never had that happen before.

Anyways... thanks for the help. I appreciate it.
 
Last edited:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top