Simple Harmonic Motion, masses, and springs.

csnsc14320
Messages
57
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Two blocks (m = 1.22 kg and M = 8.73 kg) and a spring (k = 344 N/m) are arranged on a horizontal, frictionless surface, with m resting on top of M and the spring attached to a wall and M. The coefficient of static friction between the blocks is 0.42. Find the maximum possible amplitude of the simple harmonic motion is no slippage is to occur between the blocks.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


So, after drawing free body diagrams for both blocks, I get:

m: \sum F = -\mu_s m g = m a or just a = -\mu_s g

M: -k x = (M + m) a or just a = -\frac{M + m}{k x}

Setting these two equations equal, I finally get:

x = \frac{M + m}{k \mu_S g}

However, when I plug in the values, I get the wrong answer. I think something may be wrong with my FBD's?

Thanks in advance.
 
  • Like
Likes Sunav K Vidhyarthi
Physics news on Phys.org
The acceleration is a function of time. Diffentiate the position function twice with respect to time and find the maximum acceleration. This expression will give the acceleration as a function of omega and amplitude.
 
Wouldn't the acceleration be the greatest at the maximum displacement? That's why I thought it would be find to only consider the acceleration at the point of maximum amplitude, x.

Also, I have two equations for the acceleration? which would I differentiate? Or does it matter?
 
Your method is fine; you just made a simple error.
csnsc14320 said:
M: -k x = (M + m) a
OK.
or just a = -\frac{M + m}{k x}
Oops... redo this step. (You would have caught this if you had checked units.)
 
Doc Al said:
Your method is fine; you just made a simple error.

OK.

Oops... redo this step. (You would have caught this if you had checked units.)

Oops! I need to slow down a little bit when doing my simple algebra :-P

I re-did it, checked my units (came out to meters),plugged it, and got the right answer.

Thanks
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top