Understanding Simple Kinematics: Solving for Velocity in Resisted Motion

  • Thread starter Thread starter bcjochim07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kinematics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving for velocity in resisted motion where the retarding force is proportional to velocity, represented by the equation Fr = -kmv. The initial approach using the kinematic equation v = vo + at is deemed inappropriate because acceleration is not constant in this scenario. Instead, the correct method involves using calculus to derive the velocity function, leading to v = vo * e^(-kt) after applying initial conditions. This highlights the importance of recognizing that the changing force results in variable acceleration, which invalidates the use of constant acceleration equations. Understanding this distinction is crucial for accurately solving problems in kinematics involving resistance.
bcjochim07
Messages
366
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I should know this, but it's been awhile since I've dealt w/ kinematics.

As the simplest example of resisted motion of a particle, find the velocity of horizontal motion in a medium in which the retarding force is proportional to velocity.

So Fr is something like -kmv, where k is a constant.

I'm tempted to use v=vo+at in this manner:

ma=-kmv, so a = -kv
then v=vo-kvt
v(1+kt)=vo
v=vo/(1+kt)

But my book uses integrals:
mdv/dt=-kmv
int(dv/v)=-k*int(dt)
lnv=-kt+C , v= c1e^-kt where (c1=e^C) and applying initial conditions you get
v=vo*e^-kt
and this makes a lot of sense to me.

So could somebody please refresh me on why I cannot solve for a and substitute into v=vo+at? I'm thinking it has to do with the constantly changing force, but I'm looking for a good explanation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Kinematic equation v = vo + at is applicable to a motion having constant acceleration. But in the given problem acceleration is not constant.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top