Simple Lagrangian mechanics problem.

Lavabug
Messages
858
Reaction score
37

Homework Statement



See image (I think I forgot to rotate it, careful with your necks!):
http://img600.imageshack.us/img600/7888/p1000993t.jpg

The system consists of 2 point masses joined by a rigid massless bar of length 2l, which can rotate freely only in the z-x plane. The center of the bar is attached to a spring with constant k, natural length delta, which remains along the OY axis. Gravity acts down along the z-axis. Find the Lagrangian and the canonical equations of motion

The Attempt at a Solution


Just wanted to check if my solution looks correct, I identified 2 generalized coordinates total.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your set up looks fine to me, though I didn't actually check your differentiation. You should have 2 generalized coordinates: one from the bar because the bar is rigid, and another from the spring. What you need to ask yourself is, what are some limits I can take, what do I expect from the limits, and what do the limits from your equations actually give? For example, in the case that mass 2 is much bigger than mass 1, what physical system do you now have, and do your equations support it?
 
Mindscrape said:
Your set up looks fine to me, though I didn't actually check your differentiation. You should have 2 generalized coordinates: one from the bar because the bar is rigid, and another from the spring. What you need to ask yourself is, what are some limits I can take, what do I expect from the limits, and what do the limits from your equations actually give? For example, in the case that mass 2 is much bigger than mass 1, what physical system do you now have, and do your equations support it?

Not sure what you mean by "one from the bar", do you mean an angle that the center of the bar makes with the X axis? I hope so lol.

When m2>>m1... don't know what I'd have, I think my equation of motion is general enough. I guess you could say if one mass was really big, the bar wouldn't rotate much... maybe something worth studying from the point of small oscillations, but that's not what I'm asked in this problem. :P
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top