Simultaneity in General Relativity and Problem with coordinate systems concepts.

MManuel Abad
Messages
40
Reaction score
0
Hi there, Physics lovers. I'm studying "The Classical Theory of Fields" from the "Course of Theoretical Physics" book series by Lev D. Landau, and I'm stuck with simultaneity in General Relativity.

In page 251 of the Fourth "revised" english edition, by Butterworth Heinemann, There begins the section 84 on "Distances and time intervals". At the beginning we obtein the proper time in terms of the curvilinear coordinates x0, x1, x2 and x3. I don't get it: Are this coordinates the coordinates with respect to what system? Any system?

Then in the next page Landau explains fig. 18. x0 is the time when the light signal arrives at point A. As measured by that arbitrary system? or by B?

And at last, at page 254 Landau talks about simultaneity, and considers as simultaneous with the moment x0 at point A that reading of the clock at B which is half-way between the moments of departure and return of the signal at that point. Now I'm really confused:

Again, with respect to what system? That very same arbitrary system? Why would x0 be simultaneous with x0+\Deltax0, if they're both times measured at that arbitrary system and they're different? And why \Deltax0 is equal to that "mean" of those differentials of x0??

PLEASE, I NEED YOUR HELP!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
MManuel Abad said:
At the beginning we obtein the proper time in terms of the curvilinear coordinates x0, x1, x2 and x3. I don't get it: Are this coordinates the coordinates with respect to what system? Any system?

General Relativity allows essentially any coordinates whatsoever.
 
Yeahh, thank you so much... but Landau may be considering in the other precise situations which I also explain, a reference frame centered on B or something like that.
 
MManuel Abad said:
In page 251 of the Fourth "revised" english edition, by Butterworth Heinemann, There begins the section 84 on "Distances and time intervals". At the beginning we obtein the proper time in terms of the curvilinear coordinates x0, x1, x2 and x3. I don't get it: Are this coordinates the coordinates with respect to what system? Any system?
(my bold)
I don't have the text in front of me, but maybe this will help.

The 'system' here seems to be a curved spacetime where infinitesimal distances are defined - so there must be a metric. We have to assume that the space is endowed with coordinates, and there is a choice when we write the metric.

So, to calculate the proper intervals along worldlines, use the coordinates in which the metric is expressed, over the range in which the coordinates are valid.
 
Last edited:
Thanks a lot! It really helped! :D
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
In Philippe G. Ciarlet's book 'An introduction to differential geometry', He gives the integrability conditions of the differential equations like this: $$ \partial_{i} F_{lj}=L^p_{ij} F_{lp},\,\,\,F_{ij}(x_0)=F^0_{ij}. $$ The integrability conditions for the existence of a global solution ##F_{lj}## is: $$ R^i_{jkl}\equiv\partial_k L^i_{jl}-\partial_l L^i_{jk}+L^h_{jl} L^i_{hk}-L^h_{jk} L^i_{hl}=0 $$ Then from the equation: $$\nabla_b e_a= \Gamma^c_{ab} e_c$$ Using cartesian basis ## e_I...
Back
Top