Simultaneity question: light in a moving spaceship

senorhosh
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Spaceship with proper length 100m is moving at 0.2c in +x direction. In the back and front of the spaceship is a light source.
a. When the light in the back is turned on, how long will it take for the light to reach the front of the spaceship?
b. How about the light in the front? (to reach the back)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


a. I'm guessing because light always moves at c in all reference frames, t = d/c or 100/c? There would be no time dilation or length dilation because light is moving the same frame as the space ship
b. Same answer as a. for the same reasons.

For some reason, I don't think this is correct. I'm not sure why... it just seems off..
Any help? thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I suspect they want the time it takes for the light to travel according to the frame that views the rocket as moving at 0.2c.
 
Doc Al said:
I suspect they want the time it takes for the light to travel according to the frame that views the rocket as moving at 0.2c.

Whoops I forgot to add this in.
"Measured by the frame of the spaceship". So no..
sorry about that. Anyway would my answer be correct then?
 
senorhosh said:
Whoops I forgot to add this in.
"Measured by the frame of the spaceship". So no..
sorry about that. Anyway would my answer be correct then?
Yes, in that case your answers are correct: the time of travel is simply 100m/c in each direction. (From the frame of the rocket, the rocket is at rest.)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top