A Smart Algebra of Exp. on Pg 191 of Peskin & Schroeder

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around simplifying a complex expression from Peskin & Schroeder regarding the vertex correction function. Participants are focused on transitioning from the left-hand side (LHS) to the right-hand side (RHS) of the equation, specifically addressing the presence of different mass terms. Clarifications are made about the relationship between the spinors on both sides, emphasizing the importance of the on-shell identity derived from the Dirac equation for simplification. One user mentions they have resolved the issue and plans to share their working for reference. The conversation highlights the challenges and techniques involved in handling advanced algebra in quantum field theory.
mdb71
Messages
5
Reaction score
3
Hi all, I have a problem working out the algebra of the following expression in Peskin & Schroeder in a smart way to give the result. It is on page 191, regarding the numerator of the vertex correction function.
We want to get from the LHS to the RHS of the following expression
$$\bar{u}(p')[-\frac{1}{2}l^2\gamma^\mu + (z\not{p}-y\not{q})\gamma^{\mu}(z\not{p}+(1-y)\not{q}) + m^2\gamma^{\mu}-2m((1-2y)q^{\mu}+2zp^{\mu})]u(p)$$ $$ = \bar{u}(p')[\gamma^{\mu}(-\frac{1}{2}l^2+(1-x)(1-y)q^2+(1-2z-z^2)m^2)+(p'^{\mu}+p^{\mu})mz(1-z)+q^{\mu}m(z-2)(x-y)]u(p)$$
using
$$ q \equiv p'-p, \not{p}u(p) = mu(p), \bar{u}(p')\not{p'} = m\bar{u}(p'), \bar{u}(p')\not{q}u(p) = 0,\\
x+y+z = 1$$

Thanks a lot in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In the LHS you have ##m^2##, while in the RHS you have ##(1-2z-z^2)m^2##. What is the relation between ##\bar{u}(p')## (LHS) and ##u(p')## (RHS)?
 
mathman said:
In the LHS you have ##m^2##, while in the RHS you have ##(1-2z-z^2)m^2##. What is the relation between ##\bar{u}(p')## (LHS) and ##u(p')## (RHS)?
The argument of u is p, not p'. What do you mean what is their relation? They are spinors coming from the vertices which the propagators are attached. However, this is irrelevant; what is important here is the on shell identity - coming from the Dirac equation - by which we may simplify terms...
 
Just solved; I'll post the scan of the working in the next few days just for reference as it is quite an annoying passage. Other than that, feel free to post your answers, it is an opportunities to see some smart tricks at play
 
Thread 'Some confusion with the Binding Energy graph of atoms'
My question is about the following graph: I keep on reading that fusing atoms up until Fe-56 doesn’t cost energy and only releases binding energy. However, I understood that fusing atoms also require energy to overcome the positive charges of the protons. Where does that energy go after fusion? Does it go into the mass of the newly fused atom, escape as heat or is the released binding energy shown in the graph actually the net energy after subtracting the required fusion energy? I...
Hello everyone, I am trying to calculate the energy loss and straggling of alpha particles with same energy, I used LISE++ to obtain the energy loss in every layer of the materials using Spectrometer Design of LISE++, but I can only calculate the energy-loss straggling layer by layer. Does anyone know the way to obtain the energy-loss straggling caused by every layer? Any help would be appreciated. J.

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
5K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K