Solid State Physics - p-n junctions

GrantB
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An ohmmeter is sometimes used to determine the "direction" of a diode by connecting the ohmmeter to the diode one way and then reversing the ohmmeter leads. If the ohmmeter applies an emf of .5V to the diode in order to determine resistance, what would be the ratio of reverse resistance to forward resistance at 300K?


Homework Equations



I=I0(ee\varphi/kBT-1) ?



The Attempt at a Solution



I know that for reverse bias, the potential \varphi is negative, and for forward bias, it is positive. But that's basically as far as I've gotten.

I am mainly confused as to what the relationship between the potential and emf is, and how that leads you to getting the resistance.

I think I've forgotten too much of my previous physics class...

Thanks for the help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use Ohm's Law to write R=\frac{V}{I}=\frac{V}{I_0 e^{qV/kT}-1}. I used V instead of \phi and q instead of e
 
I'm running into a problem.

When I take e-qV/kT-1 for the reverse bias it gives me a negative number.
 
Last edited:
You also have to take V in the numerator to be negative, then you will get a positive number
 
cbetanco said:
You also have to take V in the numerator to be negative, then you will get a positive number

Ahh, thank you.

I am getting an answer of 2.5x108 when the answer is 2.4x108. Although, I think its a rounding (error) somewhere since what I'm doing seems correct.

Thanks!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top