Solid State - Sommerfeld Drude Model, Calculating N of Elect.

zellwwf
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hello PF :)

Homework Statement


Consider a system of N electrons at temperature T = 0, each having a mass of m, confined to volume V. Find the number of electrons that:

a) have momentum p<p_f/2
b) ...

Homework Equations


The relevant equations can be derived below:
but here is a sample of them
\int F(k)D(k)d\vec{k}
where F: How many electrons per k-state. function of magnitute of K
where D: density in k-space. (since we turned a discrete sum into an integral), function of magnitude of K too (although it's usually a constant)



The Attempt at a Solution



I have two attempted solutions for A, and they are NOT equal, they differ by a factor of h:

Attempt 1:
note, i will be using the reduced Planck's constant, but i can't find the bar, so i will denote it by H.
\vec{p}=h \vec{k}
\frac{\vec{p}}{h}=\vec{k}
thus:
d\vec{p}=h d\vec{k}
\frac{1}{h}d\vec{p}=d\vec{k}

Now we need to calculate the density of states in K-space (too early in the morning to write it down how i got it, but i believe it's correct):
D(k) = \frac{2V}{(2 \pi)^3}

and since:
F(k) = 1 at T = 0;
disregarding spin, as we just multiply by two if we need to 'account' for it in this question

now we can replace these results in our integral above:
\int^{\frac{p_f}{2}}_{0}F(k)D(k)d\vec{k} = \frac{V}{4h\pi^3}\int^{\frac{p_f}{2h}}_{0}d\vec{p}
transforming to spherical coordinates reduces the integral to:
=\frac{V}{4h\pi^3}\int^{\frac{p_f}{2h}}_{0}4\pi p^2dp
=\frac{V}{h\pi^2}\int^{\frac{p_f}{2h}}_{0}p^2dp
=\frac{V}{24h^4\pi^2}p_f^3
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now I will attempt two:
i will try to derive the integral itself for P-space, not K-Space

the only thing that i believe changes is the Density function, D(p)
since:
\vec{k}=\frac{\vec{p}}{h}=\frac{2\pi}{L}*(\vec{i}+\vec{j}+\vec{k})
thus:
\vec{p}=\frac{2h\pi}{L}*(\vec{i}+\vec{j}+\vec{k})
thus D(p) can be obtained:
D(p) = \frac{2L^3}{8h^3\pi^3}=\frac{V}{4h^3\pi^3}

F(p) = 1 also, at T = 0; (again, disregarding spin)
so now we need to only evaluate the integral:

\int F(p)D(p)d\vec{p}
=\frac{V}{4h^3\pi^3}\int^{\frac{p_f}{2}}_{0}d\vec{p}
=\frac{V}{4h^3\pi^3}\int^{\frac{p_f}{2}}_{0}4\pi p^2dp
=\frac{V}{3h^3\pi^2}p_f^3

-----
Apparently they are not equal,
i know i made a mistake, or two, or three..
can someone show me :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zellwwf said:
Hello PF :)

Now we need to calculate the density of states in K-space (too early in the morning to write it down how i got it, but i believe it's correct):
D(k) = \frac{2V}{(2 \pi)^3}
If I recall correctly, the factor of 2 in the numerator above is to take care of the spin. If so, you are not disregarding the spin.

\int^{\frac{p_f}{2}}_{0}F(k)D(k)d\vec{k} = \frac{V}{4h\pi^3}\int^{\frac{p_f}{2h}}_{0}d\vec{p}
Note that the upper limit in the integral on the left should be a value of k rather than p. Correcting this will change the upper limit in the integral on right (which should be a value of p). Also, the integrals are over 3 dimensions in k or p space. Did you include enough factors of h when changing the ##d\vec{k}## to ##d\vec{p}##?

Now I will attempt two:
\int F(p)D(p)d\vec{p}
=\frac{V}{4h^3\pi^3}\int^{\frac{p_f}{2}}_{0}d\vec{p}
=\frac{V}{4h^3\pi^3}\int^{\frac{p_f}{2}}_{0}4\pi p^2dp
=\frac{V}{3h^3\pi^2}p_f^3

When evaluating the integral at the upper limit, it appears that you used ##p_f## for the upper limit instead of ##p_f/2##
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top