Solve Columns Law Problem: Magnitude of 3rd Charge

  • Thread starter Thread starter iamtrojan3
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a problem involving three charged objects on the x-axis, specifically finding the magnitude of the third charge at the origin. The net force on this charge is given as 6.0 x 10^-4 N, with the first charge at +11 microC and the second at -4.6 microC. The user initially attempts to apply Coulomb's law but miscalculates due to incorrect charge values, using microC instead of converting to coulombs. After clarification, it is confirmed that the method is correct, and adjusting the charge values should yield the proper answer of approximately 6.1 x 10^-10 C. The discussion emphasizes the importance of unit conversion in calculations.
iamtrojan3
Messages
55
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Take three charged objects and place them on the x-axis. The first charge is + 11 microC, and is placed at +0.85 m. The second charge is -4.6 microC, and is placed at -0.22 m. The third charge is placed at the origin. If the net force on the third charge has a magnitude of 6.0(10-4) N, what is the magnitude of the charge?


Homework Equations



F=k (q1q2)/r^2

The Attempt at a Solution




i can find each charge magnitude in respect to the 3rd charge with the equation, but don't no where to go from there.
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Show exactly what you did. Hint: Call the unknown charge Q. Use Coulomb's law to solve for the force exerted on that charge by each of the other two charges.
 
ok i got my answer but I am not sure if its right.
Basicly i added 2 of coulombs equations 2gether.
6E-4= K(4.6xq2)/(0.22^2)+ K(11xq2)/(0.85^2)
after some algebra
6E-4=8.5E11q2+1.37E11q2
Factor out q2
q2= 6E-4/9.87E11
i got q2 to be around 6E-16 Micro C which = 6E-10 C
the answer is suppose to be "6.1E-10C". It might rounding error or i might be wayyyy off.
Can someone please check this?
Thanks
 
iamtrojan3 said:
ok i got my answer but I am not sure if its right.
Basicly i added 2 of coulombs equations 2gether.
6E-4= K(4.6xq2)/(0.22^2)+ K(11xq2)/(0.85^2)
The charges are in microC, so they should be 4.6E-6 & 11E-6 C in this equation. That should explain why your answer is so far off.
 
yes, but is my train of thought even close to what your suppose to do?
 
Your method is perfectly correct. Fix those charge values and you should get the right answer.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top