Solve Confusing Matrix Operator Equation in Quantum Mechanics

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a matrix operator equation in the context of quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the Hamiltonian represented in matrix form. The original poster expresses uncertainty in solving for eigenvectors after determining eigenvalues.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find eigenvectors after calculating eigenvalues but encounters confusion regarding the resulting equations. Some participants suggest simplifying the problem by setting variables to specific values to find relationships between them.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different methods to approach the problem. The original poster has acknowledged a previous mistake but continues to seek clarity on the current equations. There is a suggestion to simplify the equations by assigning values to variables, indicating a potential direction for resolution.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions a lack of confidence in their linear algebra skills, which may be influencing their approach to the problem. There is also a reference to standard Gaussian techniques leading to confusion, suggesting that the methods being employed may not be yielding clear results.

Beer-monster
Messages
285
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I'm new to matrix mechanics in quantum mechanics and I admit that linear algebra is the weakest part of my maths toolkit but I have an operator to convert to matrix form. I'm about 85% sure I've done it right, however I can't solve for the eigenvectors. I'm sure I'm missing something obvious and was wondering if someone could help me find it.

The operator is a Hamiltonian of the form.

[tex]H=c \left[ \begin{array}{cc} 1 & 1 \\ 1 & -1 \end{array} \right][/tex]

If I solve for the eigenvalues I get [itex]\lambda = \pm c[/itex]

Which seems right. However, if I try to solves for the eigenvectors using [itex]H'=(H-\lambda I)[/itex] and [itex]H'x = 0[/itex] for the eigenvalue +c, I get a set of equations that don't make sense to me.

[tex]H'=c \left[ \begin{array}{cc} 1-1 & 1 \\ 1 & -1-1 \end{array} \right]= \left[ \begin{array}{cc} 0 & 1 \\ 1 & -2 \end{array} \right][/tex]

Using x=(x,y), and if I'm reading this right, this would give a set of equations where y=0 but also y=x. This would imply the answer is a null vector which makes no sense.

Can anyone see where I've gone wrong/what I'm missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Nevermind , apparently I had forgotten how to take a determinant.

Thanks anyway.
 
Stuck again because now I need to solve this equations:

[tex](1-\sqrt{2})x+y = 0 ; x+(-1-\sqrt{2})y = 0[/tex]I've been pounding my head against it buit can't seem to find the way, standard Gaussian techniques seem to be leading to a mess.
 
Just set x or y to one, then you get the value of the other, (1, something) or (something, 1)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K