Solve Gauss' Law Problem: Electric Flux Hemisphere

AI Thread Summary
To solve the Gauss' Law problem regarding electric flux through a hemisphere, the key is to apply Gauss' law, which states that electric flux equals the integral of the electric field E dot dA. The absence of charge initially raises the question of whether electric flux is zero, but the later addition of an electric field E indicates that there is indeed flux to consider. The electric field provided is E = Eknot(1/square root of 2 i hat + 1/square root of 2 k hat), which must be incorporated into the integral setup. The discussion emphasizes the need to define the vector E field for proper integration and the importance of understanding the geometry of the hemisphere in relation to the electric field. Overall, the problem requires careful consideration of both the electric field and the geometry to determine the electric flux accurately.
Rockstar47
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Hello, everyone. I hope that you can help me get started on one of the problems I have due this week.


Homework Statement



Find the electric flux through the hemisphere z = (square root of a^2 - x^2 - y^2).

-

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm fairly certain I need Gauss' law to help solve this. I know that the law is defined by the Electric flux being equal to the integral of E dot dA. I'm a bit confused about where to start plugging and chugging. I also have t note that there is no charge given in the problem. How does this affect things? My initial impression is to just plant my (square root of a^2 - x^2 - y^2) into the integral and due the work for both dx and dy. This would be done assuming that z tells us that our dA is in that direction. Would this make sense?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You need to define the vector E field in order to take the dot product and integrate it, right? Or else if it's a flat E field that enters the equatorial circle of the hemisphere, you can just integrate the 2-D integral over the equatorial disk.
 
Thanks Berkeman. Yes, I believe I would need to do that, somehow...if I can determine how to set that up into the integral.

But...I have to wonder, since the problem specifically mentions that there is no charge, does that mean that there is no electric flux, either? Would it actually be zero...no charge, no flux?

Edit: There is an Electric field, however (apparently...was added to the problem later).
E = Eknot(1/square root of 2 i hat + 1/square root of 2 k hat).
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top