Solve Hermitian Operators: Prove Int. w/ Wavefuncs

T-7
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that if \Omega is an hermitian operator, and \varphi and \psi are (acceptable) wavefunctions, then then

\int \phi^{*} \Omega \psi dz = \int \psi (\Omega \phi)^{*} dz

Homework Equations



Consider the wave function \Psi = \phi + \lambda\psi

The Attempt at a Solution



In my solution, I eventually arrive at

\int \Psi^{*} \Omega \Psi dz = \int \phi^{*} \Omega \phi dz + \lambda\lambda^{*}\int \psi^{*} \Omega \psi dz + \lambda\int \psi^{*} \Omega \phi + \lambda^{*}\int \phi^{*} \Omega \psi

The first two terms on the right, I conclude, are real. (I deduce this because they are both essentially expectation measurements on their respective functions; if the functions are legitimate wave functions, and if the operator is Hermitian, then the result must be real). Likewise for the term on the left, which is a superposition of these two wavefunctions.

This leaves the last two terms. I'm guessing the next step is to compare real and imaginary parts of both sides -- which implies these two are also real, since there isn't anything imaginary on the left.

Now the answer would drop out nicely if I equated the conjugate of the fourth term on the right with the third term on the right, but I'm not totally clear on how that step would be justified (I presume this is the thing to do, though). Could someone make the logic of that move very explicit for me. (I'm probably just being obtuse).

Cheers.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
which implies these two are also real, since there isn't anything imaginary on the left.
No; it implies their sum is real.


Could someone make the logic of that move very explicit for me. (I'm probably just being obtuse).
<br /> \left(\int f(x) + i g(x) \, dx\right)^* =<br /> \left( \left( \int f(x) \, dx \right) + i \left(\int g(x) \, dx \right) \right)^* = \ldots


You could also do it by looking at Riemann sums.
 
Last edited:
If \Omega \subset \Omega^{\dagger}, then \forall \psi\in D_{\Omega} \ , \ \Omega\psi=\Omega^{\dagger} \psi. Now consider the abstract expression \langle\phi,\Omega\psi\rangle for some \phi,\psi\in D_{\Omega}. Translate it into L^{2}\left(\mathbb{R},dx\right) language. Then translate the folowing formula associated with the definition of the adjoint: if the adjoint exists, then \forall\phi\in D_{\Omega^{\dagger}}, \forall \psi\in D_{\Omega} ,\langle \phi, \Omega\psi\rangle =\langle \Omega^{\dagger}\phi, \psi\rangle also in the same language. Then use the hermiticity of the operator and you're there.
 
Using bra-ket notation,

\int \phi^{*} \Omega \psi dz = \int \psi (\Omega \phi)^{*} dz

Since omega is hermitian, then omega=omega^(dagger)
<phi|omega|psi>=<phi|omega^(dagger)|psi>=<omega phi|psi>
 
Thanks very much folks. :smile:
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top