Solve Impedance Network: Resistor & Energy Storage Element in Parallel

  • Thread starter Thread starter Valhalla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impedance Network
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
8 replies · 6K views
Valhalla
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I'm stuck on this part of a problem. I have gotten the net impedance between two terminals A and B. The impedance I got was

[tex]Z=8.39+2.22i[/tex]

Now the question is...

The network is equivalent a to a resistor and an energy storage element connected in parallel. Find their values.

I thought this was going to be easy then I realized that it was parallel not in series. So then I solved the general equations for the impedance of a resistor and a capacitor and a resitor and inductor in parallel. This is what I got:

Note: w is the angular frequency (the given frequency is 60Hz)
R//C
[tex]\frac{R-R^2wci}{R^2w^2c^2+1}[/tex]

R//L
[tex]\frac{RwL(wL+Ri)}{R^2+w^2L^2}[/tex]

Then I figured that i could equate the Real and Imaginary parts of the impedance together and then use the magintude of the impedance to solve for R or the energy storage element. I can't seem to get that to work out. Is this the right track?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is certainly the right track. Let me see what I can do...
 
I think it's the right track, you just need to get the [itex]j[/itex] part separated.

[tex]Z_C = \frac{1}{j \omega C}[/tex]
[tex]Z_L = j \omega L[/tex]

[tex]R || Z_C = \frac{R \left(\frac{1}{j \omega C}\right) }{R+\frac{1}{j \omega C}} = \frac{R}{R j \omega C + 1}[/tex]

Now if you multiply the top and bottom by [itex]Rj \omega C - 1[/itex]

[tex]\frac{R}{R j \omega C + 1 } \frac{(Rj \omega C -1)}{(Rj \omega C -1)} = \frac{R}{C^2R^2 \omega^2 + 1}- \frac{CR^2\omega}{C^2R^2 \omega^2 + 1}j[/tex]

Now obviously this expression will not allow you to get, [itex]Z=8.39+2.22i[/itex].

So if you do the same for the inductor you should be good. I got,
[tex]R \approx 9 \Omega[/tex]
[tex]L \approx 90 mH[/tex]
 
FrogPad said:
Now if you multiply the top and bottom by [itex]Rj \omega C - 1[/itex]
I think you are suppose to multipy the top and bottom by the complex conjugate which is [itex]-Rj \omega C + 1[/itex] rather than [itex]Rj \omega C - 1[/itex]
 
Last edited:
Swapnil said:
I think you are suppose to multipy the top and bottom by the complex conjugate which is [itex]-Rj \omega C + 1[/itex] rather than [itex]Rj \omega C - 1[/itex]

I'm pretty sure it will come out to the same thing. Using the complex conjugate will save some time factoring out the negatives though.

EDIT:
Since,
[tex]R j \omega C - 1[/tex]
[tex]-R j \omega C + 1[/tex]

[tex]R j \omega C -1 = -1(-R j \omega C + 1)[/tex]
So you are still multiplying by the complex conjugate.
 
Last edited:
thanks guys Ill keep working on, I figured the cap one looked like it wouldn't work.
 
I got the 9 ohms and the 90mH as well. I ended up with a couple of ugly quadratic equations and then used my TI-89 to solve them. Thanks for all the help guys!
 
Valhalla said:
I got the 9 ohms and the 90mH as well. I ended up with a couple of ugly quadratic equations and then used my TI-89 to solve them. Thanks for all the help guys!

used my 89 to solve them also ;)
 
You can do this finding admittance first as Y=1/Z=1/(8.39+j2.22) = 0.1114-j0.0295.
Next observe that, if you have R and L or C in parallel, then the admiitance has real part as 1/R and imaginary part as -j/Lw, that is
Y=(1/R) -j(1/Lw) with w=120pi.
Therefore, you get 1/R= 0.1114 giving R=8.97 and 1/Lw=.0295 thus L=90mH. There is no need to solve quadratic equations.

xxxx