Solve Impedance Network: Resistor & Energy Storage Element in Parallel

  • Thread starter Thread starter Valhalla
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Impedance Network
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving for the values of a resistor and an energy storage element (either a capacitor or an inductor) that are connected in parallel, based on a given net impedance between two terminals. Participants explore various approaches to derive the component values from the impedance, which includes both theoretical equations and numerical methods.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant presents the net impedance as Z=8.39+2.22i and discusses the general equations for impedance in parallel configurations.
  • Another participant agrees with the approach and suggests separating the imaginary part for clarity.
  • Several participants discuss the correct method for multiplying by the complex conjugate to simplify the expressions, with some suggesting different approaches to achieve the same result.
  • One participant claims to have found values of R approximately 9 Ω and L approximately 90 mH, while another participant confirms these values using a calculator.
  • Another approach is introduced where the admittance is calculated first, leading to a different method for finding R and L without solving quadratic equations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on a single method to solve for the resistor and energy storage element values, as participants propose different approaches and calculations. Some participants agree on the values obtained, while others suggest alternative methods that yield similar results.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty regarding the best method to separate the real and imaginary components of the impedance and the implications of using different mathematical techniques. The discussion includes various assumptions about the relationships between the components and their impedances.

Valhalla
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Hi all, I'm stuck on this part of a problem. I have gotten the net impedance between two terminals A and B. The impedance I got was

[tex]Z=8.39+2.22i[/tex]

Now the question is...

The network is equivalent a to a resistor and an energy storage element connected in parallel. Find their values.

I thought this was going to be easy then I realized that it was parallel not in series. So then I solved the general equations for the impedance of a resistor and a capacitor and a resitor and inductor in parallel. This is what I got:

Note: w is the angular frequency (the given frequency is 60Hz)
R//C
[tex]\frac{R-R^2wci}{R^2w^2c^2+1}[/tex]

R//L
[tex]\frac{RwL(wL+Ri)}{R^2+w^2L^2}[/tex]

Then I figured that i could equate the Real and Imaginary parts of the impedance together and then use the magintude of the impedance to solve for R or the energy storage element. I can't seem to get that to work out. Is this the right track?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
This is certainly the right track. Let me see what I can do...
 
I think it's the right track, you just need to get the [itex]j[/itex] part separated.

[tex]Z_C = \frac{1}{j \omega C}[/tex]
[tex]Z_L = j \omega L[/tex]

[tex]R || Z_C = \frac{R \left(\frac{1}{j \omega C}\right) }{R+\frac{1}{j \omega C}} = \frac{R}{R j \omega C + 1}[/tex]

Now if you multiply the top and bottom by [itex]Rj \omega C - 1[/itex]

[tex]\frac{R}{R j \omega C + 1 } \frac{(Rj \omega C -1)}{(Rj \omega C -1)} = \frac{R}{C^2R^2 \omega^2 + 1}- \frac{CR^2\omega}{C^2R^2 \omega^2 + 1}j[/tex]

Now obviously this expression will not allow you to get, [itex]Z=8.39+2.22i[/itex].

So if you do the same for the inductor you should be good. I got,
[tex]R \approx 9 \Omega[/tex]
[tex]L \approx 90 mH[/tex]
 
FrogPad said:
Now if you multiply the top and bottom by [itex]Rj \omega C - 1[/itex]
I think you are suppose to multipy the top and bottom by the complex conjugate which is [itex]-Rj \omega C + 1[/itex] rather than [itex]Rj \omega C - 1[/itex]
 
Last edited:
Swapnil said:
I think you are suppose to multipy the top and bottom by the complex conjugate which is [itex]-Rj \omega C + 1[/itex] rather than [itex]Rj \omega C - 1[/itex]

I'm pretty sure it will come out to the same thing. Using the complex conjugate will save some time factoring out the negatives though.

EDIT:
Since,
[tex]R j \omega C - 1[/tex]
[tex]-R j \omega C + 1[/tex]

[tex]R j \omega C -1 = -1(-R j \omega C + 1)[/tex]
So you are still multiplying by the complex conjugate.
 
Last edited:
thanks guys Ill keep working on, I figured the cap one looked like it wouldn't work.
 
I got the 9 ohms and the 90mH as well. I ended up with a couple of ugly quadratic equations and then used my TI-89 to solve them. Thanks for all the help guys!
 
Valhalla said:
I got the 9 ohms and the 90mH as well. I ended up with a couple of ugly quadratic equations and then used my TI-89 to solve them. Thanks for all the help guys!

used my 89 to solve them also ;)
 
You can do this finding admittance first as Y=1/Z=1/(8.39+j2.22) = 0.1114-j0.0295.
Next observe that, if you have R and L or C in parallel, then the admiitance has real part as 1/R and imaginary part as -j/Lw, that is
Y=(1/R) -j(1/Lw) with w=120pi.
Therefore, you get 1/R= 0.1114 giving R=8.97 and 1/Lw=.0295 thus L=90mH. There is no need to solve quadratic equations.

xxxx
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
44
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K