Solve Number 2 in Free Space: a=(Vrk/(1-kt))

AI Thread Summary
In free space, the acceleration of a rocket can be simplified to a = (Vrk/(1-kt)) since gravity (g) is not a factor. The discussion clarifies that while gravity exists in space, it does not apply when considering the rocket's motion once it is no longer influenced by Earth's gravitational pull. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding the context of the problem and the role of mass ejection in the equation. The original equation for acceleration includes gravitational force, which is relevant only during launch from a planetary surface. Ultimately, the consensus is that in free space, the gravitational term can be omitted for this calculation.
mopar969
Messages
200
Reaction score
0
Here is the problem: In free space, what would the answer to number 2 be?
Number 2 is a=((Vrk)/(1-kt))-g.

I think that since there is no gravity in free space the answer is a=((Vrk)/(1-kt)). Is this correct and is my reason for it correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What is the question?
There IS gravity in space. It is the gravitational force that holds the moon in orbit around the Earth.
 
Maybe.
Could you explain the formula and what the various terms represent?
 
This is the formula for the acceleration of a rocket. I thought that since the problem is in free space there is no gravity? Please help me figure out the equation? Also another note is that the rate of ejection of mass by the rocket is (dm/dt)=-km(initial). I used this and substituted it into the original acceleration equation I had a=(-vr/m)(dm/dt)-g.
 
It is very difficult for us to give useful help unless you show us the entire question, word for word.
 
The entiree problem word for word is :
The acceleration of a rocket fired vertically upward is a = (-Vr/m)(dm/dt)-g. Suppose the rate of ejection mass by a rocket is a constant (dm/dt)=-km(initial) therefore, m=m(initial)(1-kt). Therefore under the conditions of the previous equation a = ((Vrk)/(1-kt))-g. Now, in free space, what would the answer to the last equation be?
 
Okay, it makes sense now. It made sense to subtract g when the rocket was taking off from the surface of the Earth, but not once it is in space. If there is a gravitational acceleration (as in near Earth or the moon) it wouldn't be precisely opposite the direction of thrust anyway. Dropping the g looks good.
 
Back
Top