Solving a Complex Kirchoff's Law Problem - Mike's Request for Help

AI Thread Summary
Mike is struggling with a circuit problem involving Kirchhoff's laws and has shared his equations for analysis. He initially merged two 20-ohm resistors incorrectly and derived equations that led to a negative current for one variable. After clarification on his approach, he corrected his equations using loop analysis, resulting in the correct values for the currents Ia and Ib. The final calculations indicate a load current of approximately 2.67A and a voltage across the load resistor of about 26.67V. The discussion highlights the importance of clearly stating intermediate steps to avoid errors in circuit analysis.
physicsfun_12
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello there, hope you are well.

I am having trouble solving this problem involving Kirchoff's laws.

I have attached a copy of the circuit and problem to this post in jpeg format.

Thanks again in advance for any help.

Mike


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Well I merged to the two 20 ohms into one 10ohm and said that the total voltage in any loop equals zero.

so 60=20Ia + 10Ib

and 20=20Ib + 10Ia

I have tried solving this many times and keep getting a negative current for Ib. My original equation must be wrong.

Thanks a lot for any help or input,

Mike
 

Attachments

  • Kirchhoff's Laws_question.jpg
    Kirchhoff's Laws_question.jpg
    15.1 KB · Views: 442
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Mike! :smile:
physicsfun_12 said:
… 60=20Ia + 10Ib

and 20=20Ib + 10Ia

Which loop has Ia, and which has Ib, and in which direction? :confused:

And what about Ic ?

(and where do those 20s on the RHS come from?)
 
I think I've got it now.

I was using loop analysis so that's why there is only two currents.

The 20s came from 60=10Ia + 10(Ia+Ib) which expands to give 20Ia + 10Ib

You can work out the currents using simultaneous equations, giving a Ia=3.333A and Ib=-0.6666A

I of the load resistor, Il=Ia+Ib = 2.6667A

So Vl=2.6667*10 = 26.667V

Does this look about right? Thanks a lot for your help

Mike
 
Last edited:
physicsfun_12 said:
The 20s came from 60=10Ia + 10(Ia+Ib) which expands to give 20Ia + 10Ib

ohhh! you should always state an intermediate step like that :rolleyes:

(apart from anything else, you stand a good chance of making a mistake with ±s if you don't write this stuff out clearly)

Yes, the answer looks ok now. :smile:
 
Sorry about that, you are absolutely right... that's most probably why I was getting it wrong in the first place!

Thanks for your help and take care,

Mike
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top