Solving Charge Distribution for Spheres with Different Material Properties

IxRxPhysicist
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Hey all,
So the question in Jackson 1.4 is that I have 3 spheres that all have a total charge Q on them, but each sphere has different material properties. For instance, I have a conducting sphere, a sphere with a uniform charge distribution, and one with a charge distribution that has a charge distribution that varies as rn. It's the last one I am having trouble with, how can I get an r dependence in ρ without screwing up the units? I tried something like:

ρ(r) ∝ ρo*(rn+1/rn)

buuuuut that still leaves me some messed up units.

Also, ρ0 = 3Q/(4πr3)

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can have \rho(r) = \rho_0 \, r^n, but the units of \rho_0 will not be \rm \frac{Coulombs}{cm^3}, they will be \rm \frac{Coulombs}{cm^{3+n}},. And then you have to determine \rho_0 by integrating the total charge over the sphere to give Q.
 
Whoa whoa ρ can take on arbitrary units? Like Coulombs/cm3+n? The units just have to balance out in ∫ ρ dV = Q?...Also as an aside, are you using LaTex or something because I like the format in your response.
 
Yes, \rho_0 is just a constant in your equations that can have whatever units it needs to to make the units come out right. In that case it's not a charge density any more.

This link shows you how to include latex in your posts.
 
Interesting, learned something new. I just learned mathematica so I guess I will put LaTex on my to do list. Thanks!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top