Solving Double Integrals Using U-Substitution

  • Thread starter Thread starter xtrubambinoxpr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calc 3 Integration
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving double integrals using u-substitution, with participants exploring the appropriate methods for integration and the reasoning behind them.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question whether to use integration by parts or substitution for the problem. There are attempts to clarify the reasoning behind the integration methods and the need to show work as per forum rules.

Discussion Status

Some participants have expressed confusion regarding the integration methods and have shared their attempts at solving the problem. One participant indicates they have found a solution using u-substitution, but the discussion remains open as others seek further clarification and guidance.

Contextual Notes

Participants are encouraged to show their work in accordance with forum rules, and there is mention of an attachment that presumably contains the problem statement, which is not visible in the discussion.

xtrubambinoxpr
Messages
86
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Attached below

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution




So I cannot figure this out. Would this be integration by parts? or by substitution.. It provides me with an answer but no reasoning behind it and I cannot figure it out =/
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2014-03-15 at 11.35.50 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2014-03-15 at 11.35.50 AM.png
    2.8 KB · Views: 502
Physics news on Phys.org
xtrubambinoxpr said:

Homework Statement



Attached below

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution




So I cannot figure this out. Would this be integration by parts? or by substitution.. It provides me with an answer but no reasoning behind it and I cannot figure it out =/

PF rules require you to show your work. What have you tried so far?
 
Ray Vickson said:
PF rules require you to show your work. What have you tried so far?

I had done so much work I didnt want to type it and was going to upload a picture, But indeed I figured it out.. Using U sub with U = xy^2 du = 2xy and x was a constant so it was factored out leaving everything peachy!
 
xtrubambinoxpr said:
I had done so much work I didnt want to type it and was going to upload a picture, But indeed I figured it out..
You don't have to show us all your work - just give us some indication that you have done something.
xtrubambinoxpr said:
Using U sub with U = xy^2 du = 2xy and x was a constant so it was factored out leaving everything peachy!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K