Solving for Block's Acc, Kinetic Friction, and Speed

AI Thread Summary
To solve for the acceleration of a 3.00 kg block sliding down a 30-degree incline, use the kinematic equation s = ut + 0.5at², where the initial velocity (u) is 0 and s is 2.0 m. The acceleration can be calculated using Newton's second law, leading to the equation (mg sinθ) - (μmg cosθ) = ma to find the coefficient of kinetic friction (μ). The frictional force is determined by the formula F_friction = μmg cosθ. Finally, the speed of the block after sliding 2.00 m can be calculated with v = u + at, where u is the initial speed and a is the acceleration. This approach effectively combines kinematic and dynamic principles to analyze the motion of the block.
Frosty_TAW
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
a 3.00 kg block starts from rest @ the top of a 30-degree and slides 2.00 m down in 1.50s. Find (a) the acceleration of the block (b) the coefficient of kinetic friction between it and the incline, (c) the frictional force acting on the block, and (d) the speed of the block after it has slid 2.00 m
please help! :confused: :confused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
from what limited knowledge i have of this... all you would do is solev the for a using Newtons second law and then plug that into a kinematic eqtn (x = at^2/2) to find t and and then use Newtons second law again in another direction to solve for friction (mu)...

please tell me if you want a more quantitative result as i only listed th idea behind it...
 
what was that formula again i just need a better theory behind itm that was a little fast
 
for (a) use s=ut+0.5a(t2) where u=0 and s=2.0m and t=time to find a=acceleration


for (b) use
(mg sin#)-(u mg cos#)=ma

m=mass
a=acceleration from (a)
#=angle
g=9.8
u=coefficent


for (c) answer = u mg cos# :biggrin:

for (d) answer= u+at
u=0
a=accerletion
t=time


TADA!
OK!...now how abt a pay back @ pizza hut :devil:
 
thanks a million man, that really helps me out
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top