Engineering Solving for i and v_x: A Homework Challenge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on solving for current (i) and voltage (v_x) in a circuit, with the user expressing difficulty in confirming their solution. The user calculated i(t) as 5*e^(-5.6*t) but has not yet solved for v_x, seeking validation of their answer. They attempted the problem using two methods: applying Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL) and finding equivalent resistance with a test voltage source, both yielding consistent results. Concerns were raised about potential errors in the provided answer key, particularly regarding the use of voltage units for both current and voltage. The user is looking for insights to identify any mistakes in their approach.
SuperCat
Messages
26
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Find i and v_x
9f1bd6faa0ef539d5436d32024687883.png

Given answer:
d225a823c3560be5848ac8fba2392677.png
2. Homework Equations 3. The Attempt at a Solution
I have attempted the problem in two different manners, and I consistently reach a different answer. I would appreciate if someone would be willing to take the time to attempt the problem and confirm whether the provided solution is correct.

My answer:
i(t) = 5* e^(-5.6*t)
I have not attempted to solve for v_x yet, because I want to verify the first part of the answer.

Method 1: Apply KVL directly to the circuit
53ab3acec9b406125ac631548d64a84c.png


Method 2: Find the equivalent resistance at the inductor terminals with a test voltage source.
I am not showing the work for this method, but I did it this way as well and received the same answer as my first attempt.

If my attempt is wrong, I really would appreciate some insight into where I went wrong.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think your result looks better than theirs! Considering that they used the unit V for both voltage and current in their answer, I suspect that they have an editing issue with the answer key.
 
  • Like
Likes SuperCat
Good point, I completely managed to overlook that! I just couldn't find this listed in the errata for my book so I blindly trusted it.
 

Similar threads

Replies
34
Views
6K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
5K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
2K
Back
Top