Why Is My Calculation of i1 Using KCL and Ohm's Law Incorrect?

  • Thread starter Thread starter xlu2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Kcl
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the current i1 using Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL) and Ohm's Law. The user is confused about the node equation and the assignment of potential changes in their circuit analysis. Key issues identified include incorrect sign assignments for potential changes and the treatment of the voltage sources in the loops. The importance of correctly determining the direction of current flow through resistors is emphasized for accurate calculations. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for careful attention to circuit conventions and sign conventions in electrical analysis.
xlu2
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


12.jpg


Find i1

Homework Equations


KCL
V=IR

The Attempt at a Solution


See picture. What am I doing wrong?

Also, the current through 7 ohms = 2+i1.
So for V1 (left loop), can it be written as V1=-5-0.5i1+7(2+i1)?
Then V1=-5-0.5i1+14+7i1=9+6.5i1
For V1 (right loop), can it be written as V1=5-10i1?

Many thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
xlu2 said:

Homework Statement


View attachment 59056

Find i1

Homework Equations


KCL
V=IR


The Attempt at a Solution


See picture. What am I doing wrong?
I don't understand the node equation in your diagram; Why doesn't V1 appear in it? V1 should be the unknown potential at the node that determines the currents in the branches.
Also, the current through 7 ohms = 2+i1.
So for V1 (left loop), can it be written as V1=-5-0.5i1+7(2+i1)?
It doesn't look like you've assigned the correct signs to the potential changes with respect to the reference node. i1+2 flowing through the 7Ω resistor in the direction indicated should cause a potential drop, but the 5V source must cause a +5V potential rise. Similarly, the controlled source makes another potential rise of 0.5*i1 on the way from the reference node to V1.
Then V1=-5-0.5i1+14+7i1=9+6.5i1
For V1 (right loop), can it be written as V1=5-10i1?
Nope. Pay attention to the direction with which i1 passes through the 10Ω resistor. What's the resulting polarity of the potential change?
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top