Solving Fourier Series for Periodic Functions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of Fourier series to periodic functions, specifically focusing on the mathematical formulation and the calculation of Fourier coefficients. The original poster expresses confusion regarding the process of deriving the Fourier series from a given function and the implications of periodicity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to clarify the Fourier series formula and its components, expressing uncertainty about the order of operations and the derivation of coefficients. Some participants question the correctness of the original poster's formulas and suggest alternative formulations. Others raise concerns about the nature of the function being analyzed and its implications for the Fourier series.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the original poster's queries, providing feedback on formatting issues and mathematical expressions. There is a mix of attempts to clarify the formulas and address the original poster's concerns about lengthy answers and the appropriateness of the Fourier series for the given function. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored, particularly regarding the periodicity and the nature of the function.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of specific assumptions regarding the periodicity of the function and the validity of the Fourier coefficient formulas based on the function's period. The original poster is working under the assumption that the function is periodic on the interval [0, 2λ], which may influence the calculations and interpretations being discussed.

NutriGrainKiller
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
I understand what the Fourier Theorem means, as well as how it behaves, I just don't understand how the math actually pans out or in what order to do what.

I'm going to start off with what I know.

[tex]f(x) = \frac{a_0}{2} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(a_n}\cos{nx} + b_{n}\sin{nx})[/tex]

while,
[tex]a_{0} = \frac{1}{\pi} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} f(x) dx[/tex]

[tex]a_n = \frac{1}{\pi} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} f(x) \cos({nx})\ dx[/tex]

[tex]b_n = \frac{1}{\pi} \int_{-\pi}^{\pi} f(x) \sin({nx})\ dx[/tex]

This is of course only the case with periodic functions. Depending on how the graph looks it is possible to derive [tex]f(x)[/tex], the spatial period, and maybe even its tendency to be even or odd.

(Even/odd meaning whether or not the beginning of the wavelength is at the origin. If it is/does, it's odd and only contains cosine terms, if not and it behaves more like a sine wave (highest amplitude at origin) than it is even, thus not containing any cosine terms.)

if we are given [tex]f(x)[/tex], all we do is find [tex]a_{0}[/tex], [tex]a_{n}[/tex] and [tex]B_{n}[/tex] then plug into the first equation. Is this right? I am getting absurdly long answers doing this, and as far as I can tell I can't find any way of finding out whether I'm headed in the right direction or not.

Here is one of the problems I'm having trouble with:

[tex]f(x) = A\cos({\frac{\pi x}{\lambda}})[/tex], find the Fourier series (it is assumed the function is periodic on the interval [tex][0,2\lambda][/tex])
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The very important, first latex image isn't working. Neither is the image labelled (2)

Try
[tex]f(x) = \frac{A_0}{2} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(A_n}\cos{k_nx} + B_{n}\sin{k_nx})[/tex]

and

[tex]= [\frac{\sin(n k x)}{(n k)^2} - \frac{x\cos(n k x)}{n k}]_{-\lambda/2}^{lambda/2}[/tex]

Did I get those right? I'm not a latex expert, I just fixed up some underscores and hoped for the best :D
 
Last edited:
Thanks OS..formatting is working now, still need help though.
 
Last edited:
NutriGrainKiller said:
[tex]f(x) = \frac{a_0}{2} \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(a_n}\cos{nx} + b_{n}\sin{nx})[/tex]
You are missing a plus sign in the middle. It should be
[tex]f(x) = \frac{a_0}{2} + \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}(a_n}\cos{nx} + b_{n}\sin{nx})[/tex]

NutriGrainKiller said:
if we are given [tex]f(x)[/tex], all we do is find [tex]a_{0}[/tex], [tex]a_{n}[/tex] and [tex]B_{n}[/tex] then plug into the first equation. Is this right?
Yes, that is the way you do it.

NutriGrainKiller said:
I am getting absurdly long answers doing this, and as far as I can tell I can't find any way of finding out whether I'm headed in the right direction or not.

Here is one of the problems I'm having trouble with:

[tex]f(x) = A\cos({\frac{\pi x}{\lambda}})[/tex], find the Fourier series (it is assumed the function is periodic on the interval [tex][0,2\lambda][/tex])

This is because the formulas for the coefficients you have stated only hold true for functions whose period is [tex]2\pi[/tex]. The more general formulas are:

[tex]a_{0} = \frac{2}{T} \int_{t_0}^{t_0 + T} f(x) dx[/tex]

[tex]a_n = \frac{2}{T} \int_{t_0}^{t_0 + T} f(x) \cos({n{\omega}_0 x})\ dx[/tex]

[tex]b_n = \frac{2}{T} \int_{t_0}^{t_0 + T} f(x) \sin({n{\omega}_0 x})\ dx[/tex]

where [tex]{\omega}_0 = \frac{2\pi}{T}[/tex] and [tex]\int_{t_0}^{t_0 + T}[/tex] means that the integral is over any particular period. In your example, the period is [tex]2\lambda[/tex] so [tex]{\omega}_0 = \frac{2\pi}{2\lambda} = \frac{\pi}{\lambda}[/tex] and your integral should look something like this: [tex]\int_{0}^{2\lambda}[/tex].
 
Last edited:
Also, the function you have given in your example is very weird because the function and its Fourier series is the same. You can't decompose your function any further.
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K