The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving a mass on a string rotating at an angle. Participants clarify the correct approach to calculating torque (τ) and angular momentum (L), emphasizing the importance of treating these quantities as vectors. The confusion arises from the initial misapplication of forces and the calculation of τ about the vertical axis. Ultimately, the correct relationship between τ and L is established, confirming that τ equals the rate of change of L. The conversation concludes with the participant successfully deriving the correct expression for τ.
i'm getting confused … it would be easier if you typed your answer, instead of giving us a photo of your handwriting
you're trying to do τ = r x Fnet = dL/dt
but about the vertical axis, L is constant, and τ is zero
we solve this sort of problem with the ordinary linear F = ma equation
#5
rado5
71
0
Hi tiny-tim!
tiny-tim said:
you're trying to do τ = r x Fnet = dL/dt
but about the vertical axis, L is constant, and τ is zero
we solve this sort of problem with the ordinary linear F = ma equation
There are two problems in my book. The first one is an example with its solution. As I told you before the solution is \vec{\tau}=mglsin\alpha \vec{e_{\theta}} for the problem \vec{\tau}= \vec{r} \times \vec{F}. The second one is a problem with no solution which asks "Is \vec{\tau}= \frac{d\vec{L}}{dt} correct for \vec{\tau}= \vec{r} \times \vec{F} in the first example". I have been trying to show that it must be correct. I mean I have to show that \vec{\tau}= \vec{r} \times \vec{F} = \frac{d\vec{L}}{dt}.
the confusion is that you're not treating τ and L as vectors
your τ is calculated about the top of the string, and is r x -mgz,
with (as you say) magnitude mglsinα, and direction tangential
your L (calculated about the top of the string) is r x v, which is sticking up diagonally outward
L's vertical component is constant, so you need only bother with d/dt of its horizontal component …
that should give you the required τ = dL/dt
#7
rado5
71
0
Hi tiny-tim!
Thank you very much for your kind help.
I think my book solved the first example in a bad way!
I was very naive about \vec{L}, because I wrote \vec{L} = mlr \omega \vec{e_{r}} which is wrong! Because \vec{r} = lsin \alpha \vec{e_{r}} - lcos \alpha \vec{k} and \vec{v} = r \omega \vec{e_{\theta}} so \vec{L} = \vec{r} \times mv = mlr \omega cos \alpha \vec{e_{r}} + mlr \omega sin \alpha \vec{k}.
Now we have \vec{\tau}= \frac{d \vec{L}}{dt} = mlr \omega ^{2} cos \alpha \vec{e_{\theta}} = lFcos \alpha \vec{e_{\theta}}.
\vec{\tau} = lmgtan \alpha cos \alpha \vec{e_{\theta}}
\vec{\tau} = mglsin \alpha \vec{e_{\theta}} which is the right answer!