Solving Impulse: Why Only 1 Method Works for Determining Change in Velocity

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on calculating the impulse given to a ball by the floor after it is dropped and rebounds. The initial attempt used conservation of energy to find the change in velocity, but this approach failed because mechanical energy is not conserved during the collision, as some energy is converted to thermal energy. The correct method involves using kinematic equations to determine the velocity just before impact and the velocity at the rebound height. The key takeaway is that in problems involving time and collisions, it's essential to use a combination of kinematics, conservation of energy, and momentum principles. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving mechanics problems effectively.
Nito
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A ball of mass 0.150 kg is dropped from rest from a
height of 1.25 m. It rebounds from the floor to reach a
height of 0.960 m. What impulse was given to the ball
by the floor?


Homework Equations



Δmv/t =I
vf^2=vo^2 +2aΔy

The Attempt at a Solution



mghi = mghf +1/2mvf^2

vf = 2.38m/s

0.150kg x (2.38-0) = 0.35 Kg m/s

But this did not work. What the answer key did was use kinematics equations to find the velocity before the ball hit the ground and then found the velocity when the ball reached the height 0.960m. They then did change in velocity x mass to find the impulse.

Essentially, I don't see why using the conservation of energy equation to find the change in velocity is wrong. Why does this not work?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nvm, there's no kinetic energy when it reaches its peak height. stupid lol!
 
Nito said:

Homework Statement



A ball of mass 0.150 kg is dropped from rest from a
height of 1.25 m. It rebounds from the floor to reach a
height of 0.960 m. What impulse was given to the ball
by the floor?


Homework Equations



Δmv/t =I
vf^2=vo^2 +2aΔy

The Attempt at a Solution



mghi = mghf +1/2mvf^2

vf = 2.38m/s

0.150kg x (2.38-0) = 0.35 Kg m/s

But this did not work. What the answer key did was use kinematics equations to find the velocity before the ball hit the ground and then found the velocity when the ball reached the height 0.960m. They then did change in velocity x mass to find the impulse.

Essentially, I don't see why using the conservation of energy equation to find the change in velocity is wrong. Why does this not work?

Because mechanical energy is not conserved in this collision. Part of the mechanical energy is converted to thermal energy (heat) in the collision, with the temperature of the ball and the temperature of the ground increasing slightly.
 
Nito said:

Homework Statement



A ball of mass 0.150 kg is dropped from rest from a
height of 1.25 m. It rebounds from the floor to reach a
height of 0.960 m. What impulse was given to the ball
by the floor?


Homework Equations



Δmv/t =I
vf^2=vo^2 +2aΔy

The Attempt at a Solution



mghi = mghf +1/2mvf^2

vf = 2.38m/s

0.150kg x (2.38-0) = 0.35 Kg m/s

But this did not work. What the answer key did was use kinematics equations to find the velocity before the ball hit the ground and then found the velocity when the ball reached the height 0.960m. They then did change in velocity x mass to find the impulse.

Essentially, I don't see why using the conservation of energy equation to find the change in velocity is wrong. Why does this not work?

Like chester said, the ball started off with a certain amount of potential energy mg(1.25) and then ended with mg(0.96). So you would have appeared to "lose" energy.

Often if time is involved in a problem, it will be difficult to use the conservation of mechanical energy alone to solve that problem. If you can use kinematics, cons. of E, and cons. of momentum, you are good on a significant number of mechanics problems. And being able to draw free body diagrams...
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top