Solving Irodov Electrodynamics Homework: Work Required to Transfer Charge q

zorro
Messages
1,378
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A point charge q is located at the centre O of a spherical uncharged conducting layer provided witha small orifice as shown in figure. The inside and outside radii of the layer are equal to a and b resp. What amount of work has to be performed to slowly transfer a charge q from the point O to infinity throught the orifice?


The Attempt at a Solution



The point charge induces a negative charge (-q) on inner surface and an equal positive charge (q) on outer surface.
We can calculate the potential at point O.
V1 = -kq/a + kq/b
taking potential at infinity as 0,
V2=0
Now work done = ( V2 - V1 )q
W = kq2(1/a - 1/b)

The answer given is slightly different. There is an additional 2 in the denominator.
Any help appreciated.
 

Attachments

  • irodov.jpg
    irodov.jpg
    5.2 KB · Views: 534
Physics news on Phys.org
As you move the charge, the charge distribution on the sphere changes. This gives an additional factor of 2.

What you should do is calculate the force acting on the charge from the sphere if the charge is at distance x from its center. Then, you should integrate this force with respect to x from 0 to \infty. Use the method of images.
 
That would be very tedious.
I found a better method anyways.
Thanks!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top