Solving Multiple Integrals: Hints for Proving Identity

Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
Hi, I posted a question some time ago and the suggestion was to use some form of the product rule but I still can't figure out what to do.

Q. Let f(x,y,z) and g(x,y,z) be C^2 scalar functions. Let D be an elementary region in space and \partial D be the closed surface that bounds D. Prove that

\int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_D^{} {\nabla f \bullet \nabla g} dV = \int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_{\partial D}^{} {f\nabla g \bullet dS} - \int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_{}^{} {\int\limits_D^{} {f\nabla ^2 gdV} } } } } }

Can someone give me a hint as to where to start, like any relevant identies which could be of use? Any help is appreciated thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The following identity should help:

\nabla \cdot (f \vec A) = \vec A \cdot \nabla f + f \nabla \cdot \vec A

Which is just one of the 3D versions of the product rule. (You can substitute <br /> \nabla g into this formula)
 
Thanks for the help, I'll try to finish this one off.

Edit: Hmm...I could've sworn that your post made mention of the divergence theorem before...nevermind, I'll keep that in mind.;)
 
Last edited:
Yea, sorry about that. I had originally told you how to do the problem step by step, but I realized that's not what this forum is for, so I changed it. But yes, the divergence theorem is necessary.
 
Oh ok, it doesn't really matter too much now. The divergence theorem is the only connection I know of between surface and volume integrals so I probably would've used it eventually anyway.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top