Solving Particle Motion in a Rigid Box: t=0

Click For Summary
To solve the problem of a particle in a rigid box when one wall is destroyed at t=0, the initial wavefunction must be expanded in terms of free particle plane waves with positive momentum, ensuring a node at the remaining wall. The lack of translation symmetry means momentum is not a good quantum number, but momentum squared remains valid. By combining eigenfunctions of both positive and negative momentum, one can derive eigenfunctions that meet the necessary boundary conditions. The evolution of the wavefunction ψ(x, t) can then be determined using these combined eigenfunctions. This approach effectively addresses the changes in the system due to the destruction of the wall.
Svyatoslav
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have question, how can I solve problem of particle in rigid box when one of the wall gets completely destroyed? At time t = 0 the right wall of box gets completely destroyed, left wall is still here( ψ(0) = 0 ), also at t = 0 we know that particle is in ground state.
How can I search for evolution ψ(x, t)?
 

Attachments

  • particle.png
    particle.png
    10.6 KB · Views: 369
Physics news on Phys.org
Expand the t=0 wavefunction (presumably the g.s. of a particle in a box) in free particle plane waves with positive momentum and having a node at the left wall.
 
Christopher Grayce said:
Expand the t=0 wavefunction (presumably the g.s. of a particle in a box) in free particle plane waves with positive momentum and having a node at the left wall.
Due to the wall, there is no translation symmetry and momentum is not a good quantum number. However, momentum squared is. Combining eigenfunctions of positive and negative momentum you can get eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian that satisfy the appropriate boundary condition.
 
Beams of electrons and protons move parallel to each other in the same direction. They ______. a. attract each other. b. repel each other. c. neither attract nor repel. d. the force of attraction or repulsion depends upon the speed of the beams. This is a previous-year-question of CBSE Board 2023. The answer key marks (b) as the right option. I want to know why we are ignoring Coulomb's force?
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
I treat this question as two cases of Doppler effect. (1) When the sound wave travels from bat to moth Speed of sound = 222 x 1.5 = 333 m/s Frequency received by moth: $$f_1=\frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ (2) When the sound wave is reflected from moth back to bat Frequency received by bat (moth as source and bat as observer): $$f_2=\frac{333}{333-v}\times f_1$$ $$230.3=\frac{333}{333-v}\times \frac{333+v}{333}\times 222$$ Solving this equation, I get ##v=6.1## m/s but the answer key is...