Solving Particle Motion in a Rigid Box: t=0

AI Thread Summary
To solve the problem of a particle in a rigid box when one wall is destroyed at t=0, the initial wavefunction must be expanded in terms of free particle plane waves with positive momentum, ensuring a node at the remaining wall. The lack of translation symmetry means momentum is not a good quantum number, but momentum squared remains valid. By combining eigenfunctions of both positive and negative momentum, one can derive eigenfunctions that meet the necessary boundary conditions. The evolution of the wavefunction ψ(x, t) can then be determined using these combined eigenfunctions. This approach effectively addresses the changes in the system due to the destruction of the wall.
Svyatoslav
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have question, how can I solve problem of particle in rigid box when one of the wall gets completely destroyed? At time t = 0 the right wall of box gets completely destroyed, left wall is still here( ψ(0) = 0 ), also at t = 0 we know that particle is in ground state.
How can I search for evolution ψ(x, t)?
 

Attachments

  • particle.png
    particle.png
    10.6 KB · Views: 365
Physics news on Phys.org
Expand the t=0 wavefunction (presumably the g.s. of a particle in a box) in free particle plane waves with positive momentum and having a node at the left wall.
 
Christopher Grayce said:
Expand the t=0 wavefunction (presumably the g.s. of a particle in a box) in free particle plane waves with positive momentum and having a node at the left wall.
Due to the wall, there is no translation symmetry and momentum is not a good quantum number. However, momentum squared is. Combining eigenfunctions of positive and negative momentum you can get eigenfunctions of the Hamiltonian that satisfy the appropriate boundary condition.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top