Solving Pendulum Oscillation Homework Problem

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a pendulum oscillation problem where a student is trying to determine the time it takes for a pendulum mass to move between two specific points on a meter stick. The student initially used the incorrect approach, leading to an unrealistic time calculation, and sought clarification on the correct method. Participants suggested using the correct equations for angular frequency and position while ensuring proper unit conversions from centimeters to meters. They emphasized the importance of calculating the change in position (delta y) and provided guidance on setting up the equations correctly. The conversation highlights common pitfalls in applying physics equations and the significance of careful calculations in achieving accurate results.
heartofaragorn
Messages
33
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A student decides to use a simple pendulum to check the shutter time of her camera. A meter stick is laid horizontally, and a simple pendulum is set up so that, when it is hanging vertically, the mass falls on the 50.0 cm mark of the meter stick. The pendulum is set into oscillation such that at its extreme positions, the mass falls on the 40.0 cm and 60.0 cm graduations. The student has chosen the length of the pendulum to be 99.3 cm.

She then takes a photography of the pendulum as it is oscillating. Her camera is set to a nominal 1/10 of second shutter time. By careful inspection of the photography, she observes that the mass moved directly from the 41.2 cm to 43.9 cm scale markings on the meter stick.

How long does it take for the mass to move directly from the 41.2 cm to the 43.9 cm scale markings?


Homework Equations


omega = sq. root g / Length
y = 50 cm +10 cm(sin omega t)


The Attempt at a Solution


I received the 2nd equation from an example my prof did in class, and I followed his steps precisely, but received an answer that was way too high--a difference of 9.5 seconds. This makes the 1/10 second marking look ridiculous. I tried a few other things, including using a cosine function in case I chose the sine function incorrectly, and I just end up with a negative value for time. I promise that I followed my prof's instructions to the letter--does anyone have any better ideas? Because clearly, my answer doesn't make sense. (And yes, my calculator is in radian mode and I double-checked my decimal points and conversions between cm and m).

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use either sine or cosine, though you will find that cosine is more conventional (in this case it would require a phase angle). Now you said that you tried something, and you want a better idea, yet you never showed the work of what you tried. Did you simply put in the two distances to solve for time? Also, you mention that you are off by a factor of 10, did you convert your centimeters into meters?
 
First, I solved for omega using the first formula. Then I inserted the values 41.2 and 43.9 (separate equations, of course) as "y", and solved for t from there. I originally had not done the conversions, but even after I did, I still came up with the same answer. My prof didn't actually show us how to use a phase angle. Were you able to come up with a reasonable answer? It's possible that I keep making the same mistake somewhere.
 
You are starting at 50cm (when mass is hanging motionless) on the scale. So should 50 be in y = 50 cm +10 cm(sin omega t)? Wouldn't you want to use a delta y?
 
I think you have the right idea for the most part. You have two equations, x2(t) and x1(t), and you want to find the time it took for the pendulum to travel between those two points (x2 - x1 = delta(x) = change in x).

x_2(t) = .5 + .1sin(\sqrt{\frac{g}{.993}}t) = .412
x_1(t) = .5 + .1sin(\sqrt{\frac{g}{.993}}t) = .439

Should give you a reasonable answer for the time.

Also: I converted the cm to meters to keep the gravitational constant in meters, but you could also just make g = 98cm/s^2, and keep the cm whole.
 
Last edited:
That does look much better. Still can't figure out what I did wrong the first time. Oh well...thanks for the help!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top