Solving quadratic equations using formula

AI Thread Summary
To determine how long it takes for the diver to reach the water, the height equation h = -4.9t^2 + t + 35 is set to zero, resulting in a quadratic equation. To find the time taken to fall from 35 m to 25 m, the equation is adjusted to h = 25, leading to another quadratic equation. Both equations can be solved using the quadratic formula, which will yield two potential solutions for time, one of which may not be physically relevant. The discussion emphasizes understanding how to manipulate and solve quadratic equations in the context of motion. Mastery of these concepts is crucial for solving similar problems in physics.
Hyzon
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
1. An Acapulco diver dives into the sea from a height of 35 m. His height h metres t seconds after leaving the cliff is given by h=-4.9t^2+t+35. How long is it until he reaches the water? How long does it take him to fall from 35 m to 25 m?
2. (-b +/-(sqrt)b^2-4ac)/2b
3. I don't have any work done on this problem because I don't even know where to start. In previous questions I was merely using the quadratic formula to solve for the roots, but in this question I have to solve for a variable. The textbook doesn't mention this type of problem anywhere, any help on getting started would be wonderful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF Hyzon!

There is nothing new here. You're given the equation for the height, h, as a function of time, and you need to solve it in order to figure out the elapsed time at two different heights.

The first height is h = 0, since the question asks you to figure out how long it takes him to hit the water, and the height is measured from the water's surface. Plugging in h = 0 gives you:

-4.9t2 + t + 35 = 0

The second height for which you have to solve the equation is h = 25 m, which gives you:

-4.9t2 + t + 35 = 25

These are both quadratic equations. You can solve them both using the quadratic formula.

EDIT: Since these are quadratic equations, you will always get two answers for t. However, one of them will probably be unphysical (unless it just corresponds to reaching that height on the way up, before he reaches max height and starts falling again).
 
Ah, yeah I knew I was looking at it wrong. Thanks a lot for the help!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Back
Top