Solving quadratic equations using formula

AI Thread Summary
To determine how long it takes for the diver to reach the water, the height equation h = -4.9t^2 + t + 35 is set to zero, resulting in a quadratic equation. To find the time taken to fall from 35 m to 25 m, the equation is adjusted to h = 25, leading to another quadratic equation. Both equations can be solved using the quadratic formula, which will yield two potential solutions for time, one of which may not be physically relevant. The discussion emphasizes understanding how to manipulate and solve quadratic equations in the context of motion. Mastery of these concepts is crucial for solving similar problems in physics.
Hyzon
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
1. An Acapulco diver dives into the sea from a height of 35 m. His height h metres t seconds after leaving the cliff is given by h=-4.9t^2+t+35. How long is it until he reaches the water? How long does it take him to fall from 35 m to 25 m?
2. (-b +/-(sqrt)b^2-4ac)/2b
3. I don't have any work done on this problem because I don't even know where to start. In previous questions I was merely using the quadratic formula to solve for the roots, but in this question I have to solve for a variable. The textbook doesn't mention this type of problem anywhere, any help on getting started would be wonderful.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF Hyzon!

There is nothing new here. You're given the equation for the height, h, as a function of time, and you need to solve it in order to figure out the elapsed time at two different heights.

The first height is h = 0, since the question asks you to figure out how long it takes him to hit the water, and the height is measured from the water's surface. Plugging in h = 0 gives you:

-4.9t2 + t + 35 = 0

The second height for which you have to solve the equation is h = 25 m, which gives you:

-4.9t2 + t + 35 = 25

These are both quadratic equations. You can solve them both using the quadratic formula.

EDIT: Since these are quadratic equations, you will always get two answers for t. However, one of them will probably be unphysical (unless it just corresponds to reaching that height on the way up, before he reaches max height and starts falling again).
 
Ah, yeah I knew I was looking at it wrong. Thanks a lot for the help!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...

Similar threads

Back
Top