Solving Spring Truck Problem 2: Compute Work, Speed, if Force is Conservative

  • Thread starter Thread starter TyFelmingham
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Spring Truck
AI Thread Summary
The spring in question does not conform to Hooke's law, with a force law defined as F = – k1x – k2x^2, where k1 and k2 are given constants. To compute the work required to stretch the spring from 0.500 m to 1.00 m, integration of the force over the specified limits is necessary due to the variable nature of the force. A particle of mass 2.17 kg attached to the spring will reach a specific speed when the spring returns to its original extension of 0.500 m after being released. The discussion also emphasizes that the force exerted by the spring is nonconservative, as it does not meet the criteria for conservative forces. Understanding these principles is crucial for accurately solving the problem.
TyFelmingham
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
2. A spring from the truck is found not to conform to Hooke’s law. The force law for this spring is
found to be:
F = – k1x – k2 x^2
where k1 = 52.8 N.m-1; k2 = 38.4 N.m-2.
a) Compute the work required to stretch the spring from x = 0.500 m to x = 1.00 m.
b) With one end of the spring fixed, a particle of mass 2.17 kg is attached to the other end of the
spring when it is extended by an amount x = 1.00 m. If the particle is then released from rest,
compute its speed at the instant the spring has returned to the configuration in which the extension
is x = 0.500 m.
c) Is the force exerted by the spring conservative or nonconservative? Explain your answer.

Ok, for a)

sub in the numbers for x = 1m and you get -91.2 N
sub in the numbers for x= .5m and you get - 36 N

So force is 127.2 N when the spring is stretched from .5 to 1m?

As W = F*x, do i just plug in x=.5m and F = 127.2 N?

Cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In a and b. Calculate the energy in x = 0,5 and x = 1,00. You can't do a with the simple W = Fs because F is changeable.
 
KingOfTwilight said:
In a and b. Calculate the energy in x = 0,5 and x = 1,00. You can't do a with the simple W = Fs because F is changeable.
So you have to integrate?
 
Yeah, I think so,

Work done = Integral F.dx : Limits of Integraton are from x = 0.5 to x = 1.00
 
Naeem said:
Yeah, I think so,

Work done = Integral F.dx : Limits of Integraton are from x = 0.5 to x = 1.00
Cheers :smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top