Solving Springs Problem: Force of Block 47, Combined Spring Constant?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnny872005
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Springs
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving springs and a block, specifically focusing on the forces exerted by the springs and the calculation of the combined spring constant. Participants are attempting to understand the relationship between the forces and the spring constants in the context of the problem presented.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the forces exerted by the springs on the block and the need to find the displacement that balances these forces against the gravitational force. There are questions about the interpretation of the problem, particularly regarding the setup and the potential for the block to be at an angle.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on drawing free body diagrams to visualize the forces involved. There is acknowledgment of the problem's wording and the implications of the springs stretching equally under the weight of the block. Multiple interpretations of the problem setup are being explored, particularly concerning the geometry of the springs and the block.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem explicitly states that the weight stretches each spring equally, which may influence how they approach the calculations. There is also a mention of the need for additional information regarding the distances of the springs from the center of mass to fully address the torque considerations.

johnny872005
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
ok guys I'm working on this problem:

http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/1457/b15bf.jpg

now, I think the answer is 7.0149 because the force of the block is 47, and when u divide by the bigger spring constant, 6.7, u get 7.0149
The other one expands more. I think the question is worded weird... is this right?

also, how exactly would I go about solving for the combined spring constant?

thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Both springs will exert a force on the block, you need to find the value of x such that the sum of their forces counteracts the gravitational force.
 
sorry, but I still don't get it. I understand what you're saying, but my main problem is, in my mind, I see the block being crooked
 
I think you're right, that could happen. I don't think the problem intends for you to take that tact though, there's no information given on the relative distances of the springs from the center of the rod. You'd have to take into account the torques exerted by the springs about the rod's CM, and for that you'd need to know how far they are. I say comfort yourself in the fact that the spring with the smaller spring constant seems to be further out, so it'll be exerting a smaller force with a larger distance from the CM which could make up for it in terms of torque.

In short, ignore the rotation problem :wink:
 
still lost lol. So do I just use the smaller one? What is wrong with my math in my first post?
 
Draw a free body diagram for the rod. You have three forces acting on it, one for each spring and one for the force of gravity. If the rod isn't accelerating the sum of all the forces acting on it is equal to zero.

By the way, while re-reading the problem I noticed that it explicitly states that "the 47N weight stretches each spring equally" so don't worry about any possibility of it being at an angle.
 
dicerandom said:
Draw a free body diagram for the rod. You have three forces acting on it, one for each spring and one for the force of gravity. If the rod isn't accelerating the sum of all the forces acting on it is equal to zero.

By the way, while re-reading the problem I noticed that it explicitly states that "the 47N weight stretches each spring equally" so don't worry about any possibility of it being at an angle.

For the record:
[tex]F_1=k_1x[/tex]
[tex]F_2=k_2x[/tex]
[tex]F_1+F_2=47N[/tex]
Three equations, three unknowns.

-Dan
 

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K