Solving Springs Problem: Force of Block 47, Combined Spring Constant?

  • Thread starter Thread starter johnny872005
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Springs
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a physics problem involving a block and two springs with different spring constants. The initial calculation of the force exerted by the block is debated, with a focus on determining the combined spring constant. Participants emphasize the importance of drawing a free body diagram to visualize the forces acting on the rod, including the gravitational force and the forces from each spring. Clarification is provided that the problem states the weight stretches each spring equally, alleviating concerns about the block being at an angle. The final approach involves using the equations of force to solve for the unknowns related to the springs and the block.
johnny872005
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
ok guys I'm working on this problem:

http://img238.imageshack.us/img238/1457/b15bf.jpg

now, I think the answer is 7.0149 because the force of the block is 47, and when u divide by the bigger spring constant, 6.7, u get 7.0149
The other one expands more. I think the question is worded weird... is this right?

also, how exactly would I go about solving for the combined spring constant?

thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Both springs will exert a force on the block, you need to find the value of x such that the sum of their forces counteracts the gravitational force.
 
sorry, but I still don't get it. I understand what you're saying, but my main problem is, in my mind, I see the block being crooked
 
I think you're right, that could happen. I don't think the problem intends for you to take that tact though, there's no information given on the relative distances of the springs from the center of the rod. You'd have to take into account the torques exerted by the springs about the rod's CM, and for that you'd need to know how far they are. I say comfort yourself in the fact that the spring with the smaller spring constant seems to be further out, so it'll be exerting a smaller force with a larger distance from the CM which could make up for it in terms of torque.

In short, ignore the rotation problem :wink:
 
still lost lol. So do I just use the smaller one? What is wrong with my math in my first post?
 
Draw a free body diagram for the rod. You have three forces acting on it, one for each spring and one for the force of gravity. If the rod isn't accelerating the sum of all the forces acting on it is equal to zero.

By the way, while re-reading the problem I noticed that it explicitly states that "the 47N weight stretches each spring equally" so don't worry about any possibility of it being at an angle.
 
dicerandom said:
Draw a free body diagram for the rod. You have three forces acting on it, one for each spring and one for the force of gravity. If the rod isn't accelerating the sum of all the forces acting on it is equal to zero.

By the way, while re-reading the problem I noticed that it explicitly states that "the 47N weight stretches each spring equally" so don't worry about any possibility of it being at an angle.

For the record:
F_1=k_1x
F_2=k_2x
F_1+F_2=47N
Three equations, three unknowns.

-Dan
 
Back
Top