Solving the Heat Equation for Initial Conditions

Raven2816
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Problem:
u (sub t) = (1/2)u (sub xx)

find the solution u(x,t) of the heat equation for the following initial conditions:

u(x,0) = x
u(x,0) = x^2
u(x,0) = sinx
u(x,0) = 0 for x < 0 and 1 for x>=0

i'm really flying blind here. I've taken differential equations years ago but nothing is too familiar. i know this is second order and that's really confusing me.

so for the x^2 condition I've tried differentiating up to 3 times and simplifying. i got a solution: x^2 + t. i got it by accident so it probably isn't right.
i feel like since there are no boundaries i should be able to integrate both sides, and the plug in my initial conditions but I'm just confused in general. everything i look up online has boundaries so I'm struggling to find a comparable example to learn from.

any tips or advice would be a great help.

thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This problem is sometimes called "diffusion on the whole line." It's covered in most texts on partial differential equations. It's not worth it to attack it by trial and error.
 
The easiest way to approach this problem is probably to use the method of "Separation of Variables". That is; assume the solution is of the form u(x,t)=X(x)T(t), substitute this assumed form into your PDE and solve the resulting ODEs.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top